If you get a shooting star @ 8.91 sq. feet wind load, you will want to use at least a Alliance HD-73 or Yaesu 450ADC ($309) mounted down in the tower going thru a thrust bearing above. Better yet, use a HAM IV w/ mechanical brake.Also, CopperElectronics sells a Maco Shooting Star 8 element, which looks like the MoonRaker, 4 vert and 4 horiz, with the same power multiplication of 28, which makes me like the VQ3 design better, because of the weight. The only thing that worries me is the "wop sided" design not being balanced on the mast like a regular beam.
I had a HAM IV with my 4 element and worked great. Sold out in '92, boy, am I kicking myself you know where. I got it for doing some antenna work on a 90ft tower. I was young back then. Got the rotor, 2 coaxes off a broken moonraker, and a jb200 black cat. All that went very well with the Gold Face Maco 300 I paid $300 for.If you get a shooting star @ 8.91 sq. feet wind load, you will want to use at least a Alliance HD-73 or Yaesu 450ADC ($309) mounted down in the tower going thru a thrust bearing above. Better yet, use a HAM IV w/ mechanical brake.
I've noticed that when dealing with skip that stations fade on horizontal as they get louder on vertical, and vice versa....... which seems to indicate that signals become more circular in polarization as they travel from transmitter to receiver.for DX, it is never going to be true Vert or Hor.
When signals bounce the polariztion flips, therefor it can seem like it's circular. Using horizontal polarized antenna will have less noise because most manmade noise is vertically polarized.I've noticed that when dealing with skip that stations fade on horizontal as they get louder on vertical, and vice versa....... which seems to indicate that signals become more circular in polarization as they travel from transmitter to receiver.