This is not a symmetrical thing.
If you do this the other way, and 'volt' the DRIVER'S collector from straight DC, NOT the final, there is a problem.
Reading all I could about AM modulator circuits when I was young and impressionable the ARRL books pointed out a big difference between modulating a tube final and a transistor final.
The problem is that the bipolar transistor has a small amount of carrier "feedthrough". Simply forcing the collector voltage to zero won't force the carrier level coming out of the final to zero. Can't achieve 100% negative modulation peaks.
A tube, on the other hand, will happily reduce it's output to zero when the anode voltage falls to zero on your negative audio peaks.
But the driver transistor has very little 'leak through' carrier. Not enough to leak into the final and pass through. This is the reason you see both driver and final powered by the high-level modulated B+ voltage, rather than the final alone.
But the driver's 'leakage' carrier is low enough that you'll have no trouble achieving 100% negative modulation peaks whether the final is also modulated or if it simply serves as a linear stage after the modulated driver transistor. That lower 'leakage' level is why modulating the driver alone won't create this problem of getting 100% negative peaks.
We started doing it when customers wanted to see the same peak output on AM that they saw on sideband. The Uniden 40-channel SSB CB designs of the 80s (1979, really) modulate the final B+ through a NPN power transistor. It will always drop a volt or so between the B+ supply and the final collector, reducing the peak modulated voltage below the straight DC-voltage feed that the final/driver are fed in sideband mode. A difference of a volt and a half or two reduces those AM modulation peaks just enough for wattmeter nuts to notice and be offended.
Volting the final was the only way to get them to shut up about it.
Radios built by RCI are different, and have the same PNP-transistor current path feeding the final/driver in both AM and sideband modes, so you won't see this difference. Peak modulated AM voltage coming out of the modulator is the same as the steady DC voltage in sideband mode.
Volting that kind of radio is a can of worms I'll let someone else open.
But about the capacitor trick. Some number of 23-channel AM CB radios would have a 10-ohm resistor in line with the driver transistor's collector circuit. This was clearly meant to reduce the driver's output level a little. Found that putting a 10 or 22uf electrolytic across this resistor would boost the positive modulation peaks by two or three Watts. This was around 1976 or so, but I won't stake any claims of being "first". No point to it.
Again, it wouldn't boost the radio's actual transmit range enough to spit on. But the wattmeter worshippers loved it.
73
If you do this the other way, and 'volt' the DRIVER'S collector from straight DC, NOT the final, there is a problem.
Reading all I could about AM modulator circuits when I was young and impressionable the ARRL books pointed out a big difference between modulating a tube final and a transistor final.
The problem is that the bipolar transistor has a small amount of carrier "feedthrough". Simply forcing the collector voltage to zero won't force the carrier level coming out of the final to zero. Can't achieve 100% negative modulation peaks.
A tube, on the other hand, will happily reduce it's output to zero when the anode voltage falls to zero on your negative audio peaks.
But the driver transistor has very little 'leak through' carrier. Not enough to leak into the final and pass through. This is the reason you see both driver and final powered by the high-level modulated B+ voltage, rather than the final alone.
But the driver's 'leakage' carrier is low enough that you'll have no trouble achieving 100% negative modulation peaks whether the final is also modulated or if it simply serves as a linear stage after the modulated driver transistor. That lower 'leakage' level is why modulating the driver alone won't create this problem of getting 100% negative peaks.
We started doing it when customers wanted to see the same peak output on AM that they saw on sideband. The Uniden 40-channel SSB CB designs of the 80s (1979, really) modulate the final B+ through a NPN power transistor. It will always drop a volt or so between the B+ supply and the final collector, reducing the peak modulated voltage below the straight DC-voltage feed that the final/driver are fed in sideband mode. A difference of a volt and a half or two reduces those AM modulation peaks just enough for wattmeter nuts to notice and be offended.
Volting the final was the only way to get them to shut up about it.
Radios built by RCI are different, and have the same PNP-transistor current path feeding the final/driver in both AM and sideband modes, so you won't see this difference. Peak modulated AM voltage coming out of the modulator is the same as the steady DC voltage in sideband mode.
Volting that kind of radio is a can of worms I'll let someone else open.
But about the capacitor trick. Some number of 23-channel AM CB radios would have a 10-ohm resistor in line with the driver transistor's collector circuit. This was clearly meant to reduce the driver's output level a little. Found that putting a 10 or 22uf electrolytic across this resistor would boost the positive modulation peaks by two or three Watts. This was around 1976 or so, but I won't stake any claims of being "first". No point to it.
Again, it wouldn't boost the radio's actual transmit range enough to spit on. But the wattmeter worshippers loved it.
73
Last edited: