I guess you'll have to go through the paces and test a 1/2 dozen antennas.But how do you know that Marconi's installation isn't the exception to the rule that different designs and lengths antennas will provide more widely different performance?
I guess you'll have to go through the paces and test a 1/2 dozen antennas.But how do you know that Marconi's installation isn't the exception to the rule that different designs and lengths antennas will provide more widely different performance?
I guess you'll have to go through the paces and test a 1/2 dozen antennas.
Is the Colossal a full 5/8?
Just pay the price and get an I10k. It's the sturdiest 5/8 I've ever seen, and I've built just about every antenna made for 11m since 1965. I helped a friend assemble one and it is truly a piece of industrial engineering. It's the only 5/8 I'd trust on top of a 500' tower, if I had one. Just the hub for the match, radials and radiator outweighs an entire assembled Penetrator.I need something that will last and do a good job.....Ive heard it for years that the antenna system is the key to having a good station, and this is why Im trying to get it all lined out while I can..
No, I don't think so.
Marconi takes several readings and averages them. I think what he is saying is that of the antennas he has tested, they've all been within .9 S units of one another ............ I don't see any mention of dB.
HUH??? he IS saying 7.9 S units makes no difference ^can not stand it^
some people on here do not know the difference between a "S" unit and a "Db",......
the point was that 7.9 Db DOES make a difference, and 7.9 S units makes a HUGE difference!
No hookedon6, that's not what I said. I said that .9 tenths of an Sunit is not enough difference that you can hear or not on your radio.
You obviously might see such a difference on a typical "S" meter, but it's not enough difference value, as a signal, to ever make or loose a contact.
A famous quote by Strother Martin: ""What we've got here is failure to communicate"
Hookedon6 is use to signals s9+20, or he don't respond. You should just ignore us Pilgrims, else your Buds might get wind of such.
Keep the imax. Put up a three element. You will see improvement. Thats all I have to say about that.
Yeah, that I-snap2000 should work for a while until it starts having the normal swr issues in the rain because water will be leaking through the cracks that develop from severe flexing over time like mine and others around here.
Or you could bite the bullet and get an industrial strength antenna which will also give you better performance than the I-snap2000 unless it's more of a DX than a local vertical antenna that you want, then you should get a horizontal beam and put something like an I10k or Penetrator up through the center, using the beam as the radial system.
And anyone coming in even .5 s-units more than someone else talks right over him. I'd say almost a full s-unit better is very significant and would make the difference in hearing someone weak or not hearing him. On some meters (like amateur radios) .9 s-units is almost 6db difference or almost four times the power.
It would be nice if a simple antenna upgrade would make me clear with just the 150w out of the 2995 instead of having to run a 600w Heathkit SB200 behind it just to be heard with about the same strength on the old .9db weaker antenna.