• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

commercial broadcaster grade audio?

Oh, it occurred to me that when piping your audio directly into the modulation stage of a rig, there's one more limiting factor you may need to take into account: IF filtering.

Previously, JoeDirt mentioned the Galaxy 88. It looks like this radio uses an AN612 balanced modulator, like a lot of SSB rigs (even some ham rigs). If I'm reading things right, then immediately after the modulation stage and before the mixer stage there's a 10.695Mhz crystal filter. I'm not exactly sure what the pass band width of this filter is -- I think it's about 4Khz. If so, and if the transmitted signal goes through this filter, it will limit the TX audio response too. Bypassing it during transmit may improve things for AM, though I'm not sure it's a good idea for SSB.

-Bill

Hummm I will have to look into that, I am getting 7khz out of the radio pretty easy but I usually limit it to 5khz for harmonics.
 
Hummm I will have to look into that, I am getting 7khz out of the radio pretty easy but I usually limit it to 5khz for harmonics.

Doing a little more research, it seems like bandwidth of the 10M4D is really 6Khz, not 4. That seems about right for a typical AM radio. (Kenwood uses the same filter width for AM too, but their filters are designed for an IF of 8.83Mhz rather than 10.695Mhz. And they cost more. :( )

But here's the thing: with AM you transmit the same audio signal twice, once on each sideband, with the carrier in between. The filter is centered on your carrier. This means that, effectively, rather than a single 6Khz passband, you have two 3Khz passbands.

This in turn means your high end audio response rolls off a lot sooner than you think. The 10M4D specs that I found indicate that the passband width can vary by +/- 2Khz, so in reality you may get as much as 4Khz of audio depending on the circumstances. But adding a few Khz more can greatly improve 'brightness' and overall clarity.

It might be interesting to see what happens if you wire up a relay to bypass the filter when the transmitter is keyed. Or you could just temporarily jumper it out completely if you don't mind putting up with a little extra splatter in the receiver for a while.

However this brings up an important point: no matter what you do to your transmitter, a lot depends on the other guy's receiver. Most rigs will have that same 6Khz bandwidth limit in their receive path, which means no matter what you do improve your TX audio fidelity, it might not be noticed on the other end.

Of course that doesn't mean you shouldn't still do it. :)

-Bill
 
Doing a little more research, it seems like bandwidth of the 10M4D is really 6Khz, not 4. That seems about right for a typical AM radio. (Kenwood uses the same filter width for AM too, but their filters are designed for an IF of 8.83Mhz rather than 10.695Mhz. And they cost more. :( )

But here's the thing: with AM you transmit the same audio signal twice, once on each sideband, with the carrier in between. The filter is centered on your carrier. This means that, effectively, rather than a single 6Khz passband, you have two 3Khz passbands.

This in turn means your high end audio response rolls off a lot sooner than you think. The 10M4D specs that I found indicate that the passband width can vary by +/- 2Khz, so in reality you may get as much as 4Khz of audio depending on the circumstances. But adding a few Khz more can greatly improve 'brightness' and overall clarity.

It might be interesting to see what happens if you wire up a relay to bypass the filter when the transmitter is keyed. Or you could just temporarily jumper it out completely if you don't mind putting up with a little extra splatter in the receiver for a while.

However this brings up an important point: no matter what you do to your transmitter, a lot depends on the other guy's receiver. Most rigs will have that same 6Khz bandwidth limit in their receive path, which means no matter what you do improve your TX audio fidelity, it might not be noticed on the other end.

Of course that doesn't mean you shouldn't still do it. :)

-Bill

Bypass the IF Filter with a relay will introduce some kind of distorsion(been there done that)you either bypass the filter with a resistor or capacitor in TX and use diode switching scheme to use the filter in RX or you will have a very wide receiver

BTW the filter in the export are not as sharp as they seems to,they are a little wider from specs,a hammy factory filter is closer to specs or use the inrad's for a sharper filter



73 de Tecnicoloco
 
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure that the IF filtering has nothing to do with the transmit!

I can't see where any output modulation goes through that 10M4D filter?
 
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure that the IF filtering has nothing to do with the transmit!

I can't see where any output modulation goes through that 10M4D filter?

I could very easily be on crack. I'm looking at the "DX88HL Schematic Diagram" link here:

Galaxy Radios DX88HML Service Manual

Unfortunately it doesn't highlight the signal flows. The output of the AN612 modulator (IC3) seems to have a connection to one side of FL3 (though R80 and D19), which is above and to the left of IC3. It's a unclear what's supposed to happen next though.

-Bill
 
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure that the IF filtering has nothing to do with the transmit!

Correct.The RX IF filter has nothing to do with the TX.

I can't see where any output modulation goes through that 10M4D filter?
If it is in the RX section then it doesn't.


I think you guys are confusing high level modulation cb's with low level Ham rigs!

I think that may be the case. Ham rigs have a low level IF section where the modes and modulation and processing is generated and then converted and amplified whereas a CB has no such section as far as I know. Maybe a few do but in the vast majority of the cases they do not.
 
I could very easily be on crack. I'm looking at the "DX88HL Schematic Diagram" link here:

Galaxy Radios DX88HML Service Manual

Unfortunately it doesn't highlight the signal flows. The output of the AN612 modulator (IC3) seems to have a connection to one side of FL3 (though R80 and D19), which is above and to the left of IC3. It's a unclear what's supposed to happen next though.

-Bill


It looks like FL3 is not an IF filter. It is an SSB filter used to filter out the unwanted sideband to make single sideband from the double sideband output from the balanced modulator.
 
It looks like FL3 is not an IF filter. It is an SSB filter used to filter out the unwanted sideband to make single sideband from the double sideband output from the balanced modulator.

That makes it an I.F. filter as the ssb generator is using an intermediate frequency.
 
I know you don't buy into the tube thing.
But as a guitarist/musician for many, many years before I got into recording and live sound, tubes are easily detectable to my ear. No self-respecting blues guitarist that I have ever played and recorded with - including bassists - would ever use a solid state rig. In recording, the tube preamps have a definable 'phat' sound that only the real high-end/ultra expensive solid state preamps could attempt to emulate. Tubes have always sounded better - and they always will - IMO . . .
:D

I can tell the difference between EL-34s and 6L6s :D
 
I noticed earlier in this thread someone had alot of Behringer sound equipment they were using. There is alot of it on the used market and new is cheap. The bad thing is if you have a problem they offer no customer service/repair. My local music tech said they use cheap unobtainable chineese electronics and even he is unable to repair thier stuff.
 
I noticed earlier in this thread someone had alot of Behringer sound equipment they were using. There is alot of it on the used market and new is cheap. The bad thing is if you have a problem they offer no customer service/repair. My local music tech said they use cheap unobtainable chineese electronics and even he is unable to repair thier stuff.

Not so.
Yes it is cheap compared to some real recording equipment; yet they are still quite effective. The op amps in this gear can also be upgraded to a better quality unit. Although it works fine for what it is for the purpose of radio, the upgrades are really meant for true recording operations . . .
 
Believe me.....Yes you can! Now if your radio has the MMM mod, it would sound much nicer but you most certinaly you can
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • dxBot:
    Greg T has left the room.
  • @ BJ radionut:
    EVAN/Crawdad :love: ...runna pile-up on 6m SSB(y) W4AXW in the air
    +1
  • @ Crawdad:
    One of the few times my tiny station gets heard on 6m!:D
  • @ Galanary:
    anyone out here familiar with the Icom IC-7300 mods