Parallel technology,
About a year ago I was faced with diaphragm replacement in a number of of regulators. This is what happens when a system is designed around obsolete parts. A flat diaphragm didn't have the range of movement. A conical diaphragm had even less movement. Making a copy of the original was the only recourse. I wish I had photos on this network. Suffice to say that the result looked very much like the Astatic mic diaphragm, just a bit larger and thicker and made from full soft copper rather than aluminum alloy.
Positive and negative dies were made from 4130 steel in a manual machining operation on a lathe. In the interest of time only this was done manually rather than with the aid of CNC. By the time the code was written and the materials delivered to a shop both die were approximated and perfected the old fashioned way.
Process is simple. Place the thin sheet between the dies located in the lathe and run the tailstock into the headstock . The heat work hardens the metal and only final trimming remains.
I and several others are thinking that along with the glue separating between the original salt/ceramic and the backing that damage to the diaphragm is the most common sin found in the mc-321 cartridge.
We are collecting data for replication of the diaphragm in hopes that at least a few can be saved. Initially I'm hoping that high temperature plastics will suffice for dies and any other materials will come later if necessary. I've already found various alloys, heat treat, of various thickness to experiment with. I also have a fair bit of experience with aluminum heat treat.
A fools errand some may say but the thought persists. A fine niche for a nervous twitch my grandfather might say.
I'll report back with the results from the first die test. Whenever that happens ...