Switch Kit said:I couldn't agree with you more HM , but you know how it is with guys , they ain't happy and content unless there blow'in it out there asses
I'm a guy too............Peace.............
Switch Kit said:I couldn't agree with you more HM , but you know how it is with guys , they ain't happy and content unless there blow'in it out there asses
High Miler said:If you have to run the snot out of something might as well go bigger and coast it...
OK, so, yes it could happen that a pair of 3-500Z triodes could output ~3kw in an SB-220 CABINET, but that's all that would be left of an SB-220, THE CABINET!!!
...and I haven't even touched on the parasitic nightmare you'ld be looking at with that level of power from a set of 3-500Zs on '10' meters...
Good luck!
W5LZ said:If owning and doing is doing, then you loose. Been there done that with more than one SB-220. Without a change in primary transformer you'll never see enough plate voltage to get 3000 watts, I don't care what you drive it with. Without substituting a 'Peter Dawhl/Dahwl(sp)' transformer that won't fit into the SB-220 if you removed the tubes and RF section, forget that higher plate voltage. The standard 'HeathKit' transformer was barely adequate to start with. You can also plan on rebuilding the rectifier board, metering circuits, and find a couple of chimneys and a blower. The standard fan won't come close to being adequate, it barely is with a stock SB-220. I think I may still have a filament transformer around here somewhere, the rest of that junk hit the road a long time ago.
The SB-220 was a pretty good 'almost legal limit' amplifier in it's day. It certainly wasn't/isn't as 'fantabulistic' as people try to make it sound like. Take a look at Rick Measure's web site. He comes closer than anyone else with most SB-220 mods. See what he has to say, then wonder about that 'talking' and 'walking' thingy...
- 'Doc
High Miler said:W5LZ said:...and while you're looking for a different driver, you might also invest in a couple of new tubes.
- 'Doc
I'm with you... SB220 won't take that kind of hammering, let alone the tubes... Whew someones blowing smoke alright. Ain't the kind I'd want. Afterall, to go to the next S-Unit (6 DB Gain) you'd have to go from 1500 watts (Max for SB-220) too 6,000 watts ...
So all that damaging hammering is useless and a waste of time, if you can't keep the energy on your frequency and are splattering it across the spectrum, why there's another waste of energy, time, and needless abuse on the equipment.
I'll run mine within' specs, get the same signal report, and get a much better audio report too boot...
Can't change the laws of physics no matter what kind of smoke your blowin'...