I would have thought out on the road QRM and noise floor would be non existent. Unless your truck is QRMing your radio.
1). Sticking my neck out is in regards to radios not in discussion in this sub-forum. Thus, this last post on the subject.
2). Being mobile is a different animal than being stationary.
3).
Intelligence received is actionable.
— Problems with noise both external and internal to the truck are constant. “Relief” can be temporary. (Passenger vehicles have a similar problem set, increasingly bad with every new model year; all-electric vehicles are said to be well nigh impossible).
— A more sophisticated radio sold for Eleven-Meter use with features associated with Amateur Equipment “might” change the parameters of the statement that,
DSP is a necessary addition.
In the meantime, DSP so very much changes the experience of
mobile use (and I’d strongly suspect this true with portable/mobile Amateur gear) that it’s much a matter of use.
So, (with respect),
— Where RX is not to a fixed pattern of words;
— Where information (intelligence) determines one own actions;
— Where “legibility” has become crucial;
Any aid — at all — is
overwhelmingly an asset.
“Quality” is dependent on the users expectations (desires lower order than needs), in transceiver capability.
I’m not in this thread to offer debate, troll, or be contentious. Again it’s back to the thread title. “Perceived Limitations of DSP”, would be better, IMO. (“Quality-On-Offer”, appears to be the sub-title).
Now back to your regularly-scheduled programming.
.