OK, doing a little more research...
*) The MB8719 had internal 1K pull down resistors.
*) The RCI8719 does not have internal pull down resistors, but schematics for radios using that chip show 1K external resistors in the circuit.
*) The 979 schematic shows the pull down resistors but they are not populated on the board. The 959 schematic shows them and they are populated.
*) There's no doubt there has to be pull downs in the 979 circuit somewhere, my guess is they are in the channel selector switch circuit, I'll investigate that further when my radio arrives, but the 959 and 979 use different channel selectors so I imagine that's the difference.
*) Reading up on pull down resistors it seems they are usually in the 3.3 to 10K ohm range, however in speed sensitive circuits 1K is common. So 1 to 10 K is common, exactly what value to use depends on a lot of factors in the circuit and a lot of times in practice is determined by experimentation.
*) In the 979 channel modification circuit the 4.7K resistor installed on P6 isn't doing anything. Normally P6 is high, so no floating issues. When the switch is set to expand channels P6 isn't simply disconnected, it's tied to ground, so again, no float issues. The 4.7K installed on P5 does function as a pull down when the channel selector is on channels 1-14 and it's unpowered. In this case the 4.7K coupled with the 1K pull down in the channel selector gives a total of 5.7K resistance and the unit still functions fine.
*) Placing those resistors in series though I don't think is the best approach as it depends on the setting of the channel selector to complete the pull down circuit. Simply placing a resistor connected to the line and then connecting it to ground I would think would be a better approach as then the pull down is always in circuit as it was designed to be and it more closely emulates what's done on the 959 radios (i.e. because the pull downs are on the board near the PLL rather than in the channel selector we can open a line from the channel selector to place it low and it won't float because the pull down resistor is still in circuit, there's no need to connect the line to ground to force it low and keep it from floating).
*) It appears to me we have two choices, if the 979 circuit board has the traces and holes for the unpopulated pull down resistors then simply installing a pull down resistor where it was intended would solve the problem. What value to place there is a question, but I'm thinking anything from 1-10K total resistance on the line will work. There's 1K resistors in the channel selector we can't do anything about, so if we place a pull down resistor in the unpopulated locations we need to take them into account. Basically this would put two resistors in parallel with each other when the line between the channel selector and the PLL are connected, and just one resistor when the line is isolated to pull it low. It seems any value between 1 and 10K total will work. If we place a 10K resistor in the unpopulated area the resulting total resistance is about 900 ohms, just shy of 1K and I'm sure close enough. If the circuit isn't stable when we have the line isolated then I would suggest trying a 4.7K as we know 5.7K total works. Using a 4.7K would give about 825 ohms total resistance when the line is not isolated and the channel selector pull down is in play. 825 is probably close enough to work too. Placing resistors in the unpopulated area would be easy to do, but requires soldering on the board and I know some don't like to have to do that. The other approach would be to cut into the wiring harness coming from the channel selector that connects to J33. One could install the resistor and jumper them to ground there (use some liquid tape to insulate the bare resistor leads) and install the switches there - just be sure to install the switches on the channel selector side of the resistors so they remain in circuit when the switches are opened and the lines are isolated. Once the resistors are installed the circuit is basically the same as the 959's so if you wanted to install two separate SPST switches the channel map would operate the same as the 959 and you'd gain the lower channels.
If you wanted to do the 10 kc mod it would also work, but you wouldn't need to install a pull down resistor because the switch switches between power and ground and the line is never left floating, however it may not be a bad idea to install the pull down resistor just in case that moment between switching betwen power and ground generates some noise. If you cut the wiring harness cutting the circuit board trace wouldn't be needed either.
I think I have a handle on this...I'll play with my radio when it arrives and report the results, if things work as I think they should, then I'll take some pics and down some drawings and post back the updated mod procedure.
Thoughts, comments...speak up, you may save my radio!
Steve
*) The MB8719 had internal 1K pull down resistors.
*) The RCI8719 does not have internal pull down resistors, but schematics for radios using that chip show 1K external resistors in the circuit.
*) The 979 schematic shows the pull down resistors but they are not populated on the board. The 959 schematic shows them and they are populated.
*) There's no doubt there has to be pull downs in the 979 circuit somewhere, my guess is they are in the channel selector switch circuit, I'll investigate that further when my radio arrives, but the 959 and 979 use different channel selectors so I imagine that's the difference.
*) Reading up on pull down resistors it seems they are usually in the 3.3 to 10K ohm range, however in speed sensitive circuits 1K is common. So 1 to 10 K is common, exactly what value to use depends on a lot of factors in the circuit and a lot of times in practice is determined by experimentation.
*) In the 979 channel modification circuit the 4.7K resistor installed on P6 isn't doing anything. Normally P6 is high, so no floating issues. When the switch is set to expand channels P6 isn't simply disconnected, it's tied to ground, so again, no float issues. The 4.7K installed on P5 does function as a pull down when the channel selector is on channels 1-14 and it's unpowered. In this case the 4.7K coupled with the 1K pull down in the channel selector gives a total of 5.7K resistance and the unit still functions fine.
*) Placing those resistors in series though I don't think is the best approach as it depends on the setting of the channel selector to complete the pull down circuit. Simply placing a resistor connected to the line and then connecting it to ground I would think would be a better approach as then the pull down is always in circuit as it was designed to be and it more closely emulates what's done on the 959 radios (i.e. because the pull downs are on the board near the PLL rather than in the channel selector we can open a line from the channel selector to place it low and it won't float because the pull down resistor is still in circuit, there's no need to connect the line to ground to force it low and keep it from floating).
*) It appears to me we have two choices, if the 979 circuit board has the traces and holes for the unpopulated pull down resistors then simply installing a pull down resistor where it was intended would solve the problem. What value to place there is a question, but I'm thinking anything from 1-10K total resistance on the line will work. There's 1K resistors in the channel selector we can't do anything about, so if we place a pull down resistor in the unpopulated locations we need to take them into account. Basically this would put two resistors in parallel with each other when the line between the channel selector and the PLL are connected, and just one resistor when the line is isolated to pull it low. It seems any value between 1 and 10K total will work. If we place a 10K resistor in the unpopulated area the resulting total resistance is about 900 ohms, just shy of 1K and I'm sure close enough. If the circuit isn't stable when we have the line isolated then I would suggest trying a 4.7K as we know 5.7K total works. Using a 4.7K would give about 825 ohms total resistance when the line is not isolated and the channel selector pull down is in play. 825 is probably close enough to work too. Placing resistors in the unpopulated area would be easy to do, but requires soldering on the board and I know some don't like to have to do that. The other approach would be to cut into the wiring harness coming from the channel selector that connects to J33. One could install the resistor and jumper them to ground there (use some liquid tape to insulate the bare resistor leads) and install the switches there - just be sure to install the switches on the channel selector side of the resistors so they remain in circuit when the switches are opened and the lines are isolated. Once the resistors are installed the circuit is basically the same as the 959's so if you wanted to install two separate SPST switches the channel map would operate the same as the 959 and you'd gain the lower channels.
If you wanted to do the 10 kc mod it would also work, but you wouldn't need to install a pull down resistor because the switch switches between power and ground and the line is never left floating, however it may not be a bad idea to install the pull down resistor just in case that moment between switching betwen power and ground generates some noise. If you cut the wiring harness cutting the circuit board trace wouldn't be needed either.
I think I have a handle on this...I'll play with my radio when it arrives and report the results, if things work as I think they should, then I'll take some pics and down some drawings and post back the updated mod procedure.
Thoughts, comments...speak up, you may save my radio!
Steve