• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

FCC at the tolls and scales

Having an amp in -line is illegal. Having an export radio is not

ON AMPLIFIERS...IN LINE OR IN YOUR POSSESSION IS ILLEGAL FOR UNLICENSED OPERATORS!!!


There is such a thing called "intent" Which W9CLL is implying and absolutely right on and many of you guys still don't get it!



47 CFR 95.411 - (CB Rule 11) May I use power amplifiers?

(a) You may not attach the following items (power amplifiers) to your certificated CB transmitter in any way:

(1) External radio frequency (RF) power amplifiers (sometimes called linears or linear amplifiers); or

(2) Any other devices which, when used with a radio transmitter as a signal source, are capable of amplifying the signal.

(b) There are no exceptions to this rule and use of a power amplifier voids your authority to operate the station.

(c) The FCC will presume you have used a linear or other external RF power amplifier if—

(1) It is in your possession or on your premises; and

(2) There is other evidence that you have operated your CB station with more power than allowed by CB Rule 10, §95.410.

(d) Paragraph (c) of this section does not apply if you hold a license in another radio service which allows you to operate an external RF power amplifier.

[48 FR 24894, June 3, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 36610, July 7, 1998]
 
Last edited:
Traveling through Illinois and seen a guy checking all the truckers and antenna
toting rides at the tolls on I294 . keyed up and found out they were looking for people using exports .

this is probably originated from a knucklehead and his base station blaring across 8 channels on 20 around alsip illinois . and the commuter has to pay .

Or they're tired of truckers buying 10 meter export radios who ask Bubba at the truck stop to "peak an' tune this heah radio....make 'er loud an' proud"....in which Bubba interprets this as "let's cut thot thar limit'r an' crank tham thar pots up....so now you have a radio so loud that it bleeds on other frequencies....add on to that, an amp geared for CB use, that has virtually NO filtering which only compounds the original problem....and then the end user sees the band switch and decides to flip it over 2 notches...and starts jaw jacking in the cw portion of the 10 meter band. It's no wonder the FCC is out....not to mention I'm sure an extra source of revenue for them is always good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
the big trucks were getting harrased and searched cant say the little cars were for sure .

Smell bs ? im bet you think the police cant disarm us either . i bet you think we still have freedom of speech too.

I have no reason to lie .


You have one good reason to lie.......it's called a need for ATTENTION. Everyone on this forum has heard just about every fantastic FCC story so lighten up. When did you lose your guns to police and your freedom of speech?
Are you sure your name isn't Frisby?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62zD9gbRz0s
 
Last edited:
About 5 or 6 years ago us CB guys here in New Jersey were getting harassed by a local Ham guy. He would use his high power stuff to cover us up, record and play back what we sounded like, just over and over. 3 of us got together, contacted the FCC, New York Office, we had to fax them the issues we were having and sign the statements, which we all did, they did come out and investigate the Ham guy, gave him a warning but no fine and he stopped being a jerk. I got a visit from an FCC officer, I was in my garage with a Lafayette SSB-140 hooked up, he introduced himself, asked where my radio was, I pointed to the desk, he thanked me and left. Never checked output, didn't check for extra channels just saw it was a CB radio and went on his way. He was nice, not nasty at all.
Love those Telstats.real nice sounding radios
 
Is it probable cause or what?? If you haven't done anything wrong how can someone have the right to your private property/ vehicle?

Here in MD the DOT has been checking radios in trucks for over 10 years. I use to run a RCI 2950 for years. And after a few Drivers got hit with $7,500 fines for running Export radios or Amps. That was what me get my Ham ticket. Because they would just ask if you have a License to operate that equipment. If you had a Amateur License nothing else was said. The Police are not allowed touch a Licensed Ham.

I also noticed that the great minds of CB'ers don't seem to know about the Law President Clinton signed covering CB radio enforcement. It gives Police the Power of enforcing CB radio laws.


the FCC shall "provide technical guidance to state and local governments regarding... violations"


President Bill Clinton has signed legislation that permits the enforcement of certain FCC Citizens Band regulations by state and local governments. Amateur Radio operators are exempt from the provisions of the law, now PL 106-521.

Congressional lawmakers saw the measure as a way to give a voice to those experiencing radio frequency interference resulting from illegal CB radio operation. The FCC will not yield its authority to regulate Citizens Band or other radio services, however.

In short, the measure authorizes states and localities to enact laws that prohibit the use of unauthorized CB equipment--consistent with FCC regulations. This would include the use of high-power linear amplifiers or equipment that was not FCC-certificated (formerly called "type-accepted").

Specifically, the bill enables state or local regulation over the "use of Citizens Band radio equipment not authorized by the Commission" and "the unauthorized operation of Citizens Band radio equipment" between 24 and 35 MHz. FCC-licensed stations in any radio service--including the Amateur Service--are excluded from such state or local enforcement, and state or local laws enacted under this legislation must identify this exemption.

Anyone affected by the enforcement of such legislation could appeal to the FCC if they believed the state or local government had overstepped its authority under the new law. Any applicable state or local law would not preclude the FCC from enforcing regulations in a given case at the same time.

The new law also says the FCC shall "provide technical guidance to state and local governments regarding the detection and determination of violations" of any regulations localities might enact.

The bill--HR.2346 is the House version; it was S.2767 in the Senate--actually is the old Senate "Feingold bill" from several sessions ago. After introducing his original version a few years back, Wisconsin Sen Russell Feingold requested assistance from the ARRL to rewrite the measure to ensure that licensed hams could not be affected, that the bill featured a wealth of "due process" provisions, and that the concept of federal preemption over telecommunication activities wouldn't be compromised. The bill signed by the President is nearly identical to the Feingold bill.

The bill's sponsor, Rep Vernon Ehlers of Michigan said Amateur Radio operators encouraged him to introduce the measure in the House last year. Ehlers maintained that the local hams asked him to support the bill because of the bad rap they were getting from illegal CBers using high-power linear amplifiers that resulted in TV and telephone interference while the CBers involved hid behind federal preemption.


Sources: http://www.zone13a.com/cblaw.html



Q: Does the bill HR 2346 give local law enforcment the juridition to monito cb radio interferance.
Cb and HAM was the jurisdiction of the FCC. I just read an article that said it was passed. The gov. was trying to add that part in it. Did it get put in? (Accepting answers - asked 17 months ago)


A: the FCC shall "provide technical guidance to state and local governments regarding... violations"


President Bill Clinton has signed legislation that permits the enforcement of certain FCC Citizens Band regulations by state and local governments. Amateur Radio operators are exempt from the provisions of the law, now PL 106-521.

Congressional lawmakers saw the measure as a way to give a voice to those experiencing radio frequency interference resulting from illegal CB radio operation. The FCC will not yield its authority to regulate Citizens Band or other radio services, however.

In short, the measure authorizes states and localities to enact laws that prohibit the use of unauthorized CB equipment--consistent with FCC regulations. This would include the use of high-power linear amplifiers or equipment that was not FCC-certificated (formerly called "type-accepted").

Specifically, the bill enables state or local regulation over the "use of Citizens Band radio equipment not authorized by the Commission" and "the unauthorized operation of Citizens Band radio equipment" between 24 and 35 MHz. FCC-licensed stations in any radio service--including the Amateur Service--are excluded from such state or local enforcement, and state or local laws enacted under this legislation must identify this exemption.

Anyone affected by the enforcement of such legislation could appeal to the FCC if they believed the state or local government had overstepped its authority under the new law. Any applicable state or local law would not preclude the FCC from enforcing regulations in a given case at the same time.

The new law also says the FCC shall "provide technical guidance to state and local governments regarding the detection and determination of violations" of any regulations localities might enact.

The bill--HR.2346 is the House version; it was S.2767 in the Senate--actually is the old Senate "Feingold bill" from several sessions ago. After introducing his original version a few years back, Wisconsin Sen Russell Feingold requested assistance from the ARRL to rewrite the measure to ensure that licensed hams could not be affected, that the bill featured a wealth of "due process" provisions, and that the concept of federal preemption over telecommunication activities wouldn't be compromised. The bill signed by the President is nearly identical to the Feingold bill.

The bill's sponsor, Rep Vernon Ehlers of Michigan said Amateur Radio operators encouraged him to introduce the measure in the House last year. Ehlers maintained that the local hams asked him to support the bill because of the bad rap they were getting from illegal CBers using high-power linear amplifiers that resulted in TV and telephone interference while the CBers involved hid behind federal preemption.


Sources: http://www.zone13a.com/cblaw.html




https://bulk.resource.org/gpo.gov/laws/106/publ521.106.pdf
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Here's more on how it came to be

President Signs CB Enforcement Bill

NEWINGTON, CT, Nov 29, 2000--President Bill Clinton has signed legislation that permits the enforcement of certain FCC Citizens Band regulations by state and local governments. Amateur Radio operators are exempt from the provisions of the law, now PL 106-521.

Congressional lawmakers saw the measure as a way to give a voice to those experiencing radio frequency interference resulting from illegal CB radio operation. The FCC will not yield its authority to regulate Citizens Band or other radio services, however.

In short, the measure authorizes states and localities to enact laws that prohibit the use of unauthorized CB equipment--consistent with FCC regulations. This would include the use of high-power linear amplifiers or equipment that was not FCC-certificated (formerly called "type-accepted").

Specifically, the bill enables state or local regulation over the "use of Citizens Band radio equipment not authorized by the Commission" and "the unauthorized operation of Citizens Band radio equipment" between 24 and 35 MHz. FCC-licensed stations in any radio service--including the Amateur Service--are excluded from such state or local enforcement, and state or local laws enacted under this legislation must identify this exemption.

Anyone affected by the enforcement of such legislation could appeal to the FCC if they believed the state or local government had overstepped its authority under the new law. Any applicable state or local law would not preclude the FCC from enforcing regulations in a given case at the same time.

The new law also says the FCC shall "provide technical guidance to state and local governments regarding the detection and determination of violations" of any regulations localities might enact.

The bill--HR.2346 is the House version; it was S.2767 in the Senate--actually is the old Senate "Feingold bill" from several sessions ago. After introducing his original version a few years back, Wisconsin Sen Russell Feingold requested assistance from the ARRL to rewrite the measure to ensure that licensed hams could not be affected, that the bill featured a wealth of "due process" provisions, and that the concept of federal preemption over telecommunication activities wouldn't be compromised. The bill signed by the President is nearly identical to the Feingold bill.

The bill's sponsor, Rep Vernon Ehlers of Michigan said Amateur Radio operators encouraged him to introduce the measure in the House last year. Ehlers maintained that the local hams asked him to support the bill because of the bad rap they were getting from illegal CBers using high-power linear amplifiers that resulted in TV and telephone interference while the CBers involved hid behind federal preemption.

Ehlers says that when he was contacted initially by a frustrated constituent who had been experiencing TV, radio and cordless telephone interference, he thought the problem was an isolated incident. The CBer in question was using an illegal 100-W amplifier, he said, and the FCC told his constituent that it did not have the personnel to enforce CB lawbreakers around the country. Ehlers says he introduced his bill as a result.

As did Feingold before him, Ehlers asked the ARRL to review his measure to ensure that it would not unintentionally harm Amateur Radio.

The bill was amended in the Senate, which made a specific change requested by the American Trucking Association. The final version contains language with respect to CB gear aboard a "commercial motor vehicle" (as defined in Title 49, §31101 of the US Code) requiring that state or local authorities have probable cause that the vehicle or its operator was in violation of the regulations before they attempt to enforce such a statute. On the House floor, Ehlers said truckers were "worried about perhaps being harassed by improper use of the law."

During discussion of the bill on the House floor--as reported in The Federal Register--one member spoke of "rogue operators" whose routine CB radio operation at excessive power levels left victims "helpless" to defend themselves. "When these operators boost their CB power levels, it often causes bleeding into nearby frequencies," the congressman said.

The bill passed the House under suspension in September, and passed the Senate at the end of October under unanimous consent. The measure went to President Clinton for his signature on November 14.

A copy of the new legislation is available on the ARRLWeb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Didn't Georgia pass a state law that permits guns to be taken into schools , churches yet the Feds worry about some guys yapping on radios.

Doesn't seem right.
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • @ BJ radionut:
    EVAN/Crawdad :love: ...runna pile-up on 6m SSB(y) W4AXW in the air
    +1
  • @ Crawdad:
    One of the few times my tiny station gets heard on 6m!:D
  • @ Galanary:
    anyone out here familiar with the Icom IC-7300 mods
  • @ Crawdad:
    7300 very nice radio, what's to hack?
  • @ kopcicle:
    The mobile version of this site just pisses me off