How does this antenna beat a 102" stainless?
Stainless is a poor conductor, and when your driving down the road its bending back almost at a 90 deg angle.
Francis has a copper conductor in the middle of the fiberglass, is also more ridged when you driving down the road. There also dark gray so they don't stick out like a sore thumb!
I have ran a Francis Amazer for 12 years now and i love them! Francis is still making antenna but they discontinued the Amazer a long time ago
I think calling stainless a poor conductor is inaccurate. Do you have some data to back that up?
Thanks
hey joe , welcome to the forum . are you the same joedirt from mojo's forum ?
keep in mind were talking about the efficency of RF being transmitted on our metal antennas , not their AC or DC voltage abilities . copper , SS and aluminium do have different conductivity values , but not enough to make any diference in the real world when RF is concerned .
if i recall .... doesnt the amazer actually have 3 copper conductors in it ?
stainless steel is great for stingers/whips on antennas because its able to survive impacts and dragging much much more than copper or aluminium . its also much more flexable so it doesnt snap from impact when moving .
if you want an all copper antenna Gator makes them ...
well , except for the stinger , were back to SS again .
or go to your local hardware plumbing supply store and buy the parts to build your own .
good luck with keeping it from turning green
you really need to take some care with these antennas , they really can't take to many serious wacks before they will bust open on you.
I'll take a few Amazers as well!!!Anyone with any information on where to find the 8' Francis amazer please post here MANY people are looking for them, me included.
I am a ss 102" fan but the Francis Amazer is the best antenna I ever had. Would Love a few again if anyone knows of some still to be had.Hmm, I found it exactly opposite, the Francis line of antennas always amazed me at the punishment they would take... When I got new antennas in the first thing I did was tie them in a knot literally, If they broke I didn't sell them.....
Wilson's never held up, I never broke a Francis, Even slapping trees out in the woods @30 Below zero... And I did run them regularly back then...
Not really debating the issue, or saying your wrong, but it just wasn't my experience with them....
I always liked the Wilson's as an install, we basically bottomed the Stinger, raised it about 1/4 inch, and they were typically ready to go... 1000/5000, never liked the Lil'Wil....
Sold alot of Wilson't back when they used to give Dealers better Deals then the Distribs... Before Barjan.....
K40, never wasted my time, they just wouldn't take any power.....
LOL, kind of funny to, with the 102 SS... I never had an issue with one, only thing that comes to mind is a Rat Shack 102 that separated from the Stud....
I had less static or a lower "noise" level with the Amazer over the ss 102". Which made it sound like I had better receives and maybe I did. I want another Amazer.i think youre talking about mobile music . the place we talked about last year ?
804-275-0545 is the phone # if anyone is interested .
im not quite understanding your windnoise comment . are you saying they make less noise in the wind ? or if your saying they convert less wind noise into noise we hear on the radio ? ive never herd of that , but since the actuall antenna isnt in contact with the wind (its inside the fiberglass) that has me scratching my head too .