-
You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
HAARP?
- Thread starter Shockwave
- Start date
Hurricanes happen because the oceans are getting warmer. Can HAARP cool them? Evaporation leads to storms, you can't reverse that with a heater!
Does HF even interact with water molecules? No. The "weather" is transparent to HF. The frequencies that do significantly interact with water are UHF, and those antennas are the size of large mobile homes. So what theory remains???
Lets say you use HF to punch a hole in the ionosphere that lasts a couple minutes. Could cosmic radiation get in and warm some clouds, maybe, I don't know. But what is obvious is that it can only be done directly overhead. How would they do that to a location around the globe when the thing they need to disrupt is the same thing that gets the signal there? You would need several transmitter sites all tuned to focus on one area so all the energy takes separate paths to the target. They have one transmitter site, so any weather modification would be more evident directly above them than anywhere else..
Lets say you got a cloud hot with pure magic. Convection occurs. What then? It might rain for 5 minutes until the falling moisture cools the tiny artificial updraft? It won't make a rogue thunderhead with sharp teeth...
"Conspiracy theorists" would do good by not buying into the "theories" planted by the opposing party. This is how "that one side" puts "stupid conspiracy theorist" labels on the other side. It immediately discredits you with respect to the theories that are actually supported by facts. Make a person with good points say something dumb and suddenly everything they say is untrustworthy. Just because it plays into your fears or concerns doesn't make it fact. The value of everything else a person says is diminished, whether it is true or not, by repeating the things they plant intended to discredit the "conspiracy theorist".
Nobody will listen to you talk about how a plane loaded with JP8 can have a 5 second fireball and no wreckage if you start the conversation with planned hurricanes. Its a trap. Rant complete. Sorry.
Edit:anyone truly set on believing that haarp is used for weather modification should do two things. Monitor significant global weather patterns and monitor the frequencies HAARP uses to identify a correlation. Anything short of that effort isn't worth discussing.
Does HF even interact with water molecules? No. The "weather" is transparent to HF. The frequencies that do significantly interact with water are UHF, and those antennas are the size of large mobile homes. So what theory remains???
Lets say you use HF to punch a hole in the ionosphere that lasts a couple minutes. Could cosmic radiation get in and warm some clouds, maybe, I don't know. But what is obvious is that it can only be done directly overhead. How would they do that to a location around the globe when the thing they need to disrupt is the same thing that gets the signal there? You would need several transmitter sites all tuned to focus on one area so all the energy takes separate paths to the target. They have one transmitter site, so any weather modification would be more evident directly above them than anywhere else..
Lets say you got a cloud hot with pure magic. Convection occurs. What then? It might rain for 5 minutes until the falling moisture cools the tiny artificial updraft? It won't make a rogue thunderhead with sharp teeth...
"Conspiracy theorists" would do good by not buying into the "theories" planted by the opposing party. This is how "that one side" puts "stupid conspiracy theorist" labels on the other side. It immediately discredits you with respect to the theories that are actually supported by facts. Make a person with good points say something dumb and suddenly everything they say is untrustworthy. Just because it plays into your fears or concerns doesn't make it fact. The value of everything else a person says is diminished, whether it is true or not, by repeating the things they plant intended to discredit the "conspiracy theorist".
Nobody will listen to you talk about how a plane loaded with JP8 can have a 5 second fireball and no wreckage if you start the conversation with planned hurricanes. Its a trap. Rant complete. Sorry.
Edit:anyone truly set on believing that haarp is used for weather modification should do two things. Monitor significant global weather patterns and monitor the frequencies HAARP uses to identify a correlation. Anything short of that effort isn't worth discussing.
Last edited:
You could think of it from a signal perspective too. If it is more than one hop, it would probably affect weather in multiple places, energy wasted, and the closest seeing the most effect. So if the array were perfectly directional and could scrape the horizon to reach the furthest away part of the F-layer at 186 miles up without ground hopping, that comes to an effective range of 1200 miles. That barely touches the edge of Russia, only half of Canada, and a little into Washington state. Certainly not Florida.
Don't mind us, we're just gonna change the weather via 2 hops by putting a gigawatt on the ground inNorth Dakota Chicago lol. Unplug those SA's for hurricaine season!
Don't mind us, we're just gonna change the weather via 2 hops by putting a gigawatt on the ground in