kamikaze701s,
I'm glad you took the time to describe that harness to me. It made me realize that I've been making an assumption I shouldn't have been making, and might have to apologize to who ever made that harness. Nasty thought, huh? It takes a little explaining.
The typical cophasing harness is a section of 75 ohm coax going to each antenna, then meeting in the middle where they join usually in a 'T' connection. From that 'T' you run ordinary 50 ohm coax to the radio. Because of how phasing works that combination of two 75 ohm impedances works out close to 50 ohms that the radio wants/expects to see from whatever is on the other end of that feed line. It isn't exactly 50 ohms but it's close enough to keep the radio happy if not jumping up and down with joy. Swr typically ends up somewhere around 1.5:1 or so, which is very good considering the "conjugate" impedance matching that's being/been done.
That 'matching section', commonly called a 'Q' section, one going to each antenna, has to be a certain length, an electrical 1/4 wave length long. That 'electrical' thingy is in there because a physical 1/4 wave length they measure with a yardstick is NOT the same as a 1/4 wave length that an electron travels in coax during 1/4th of a cycle. That has to do with the speed of an electron through stuff other than a vacuum, which is called a 'velocity factor'. An electron is faster in a vacuum than when going through something other than a vacuum, air, feed lines, wire, wood, whatever. So, an electrical 1/4 wave length of typical 75 ohm coax has a velocity factor (VF) of around 66%, an electrical 1/4 wave length is only 66% of the length of a 1/4 wave length meashured by a yardstick. So at 27 Mhz, instead of about 9 feet, it's really only about 6 feet long. So, that harness should be almost 12 feet from end to end, with a connector half way down it.
And now where I wasn't paying attention.
A characteristic of an electrical 1/4 wave length is that if the impedance is 'high' on one end of it, it'll be 'low' at the other end of it. That's what makes all this phasing stuff work, so that's good. But, another characteristic is that if you put two of those electrical 1/4 wave length end to end, what it sees at one end is what you will get at the other end. That's an electrical 1/2 wave length, by the way. They are nice because it's almost like it wasn't there at all, invisible sort of. so if one electrical 1/4 wave length isn't long enough to get from here to there, you can add two more electrical 1/4 wave lengths (or one electricl 1/2 wave length) to it and it's like that extra 12 feet or so wasn't there, and it now reaches from here to there. 'Odd' numbers of electrical 1/4 wave lengths changes things. 'Even' numbers of electrical 1/4 wave lengths do NOT change things. Makes things easier or more practical sometimes, right?
So, if each 'leg' of your harness is 18 feet of RG-59 coax, it's the equivalent of only 6 feet of RG-59 coax, which is just what is needed. @#$, it ought'a work.
Now for the 'catches', and there's always going to be a 'catch' or two.
If it's man-made, it ain't gonna be perfect. May only be 'off' just a tiny bit, but when you add all those 'tiny bits' up, they can get sort of big. Doing things 'right' always means a little more work and/or money. May still have a few of them 'tiny bits' wrong with it, but not near as many, sort of. ("Perfect" requires a huge amount of money/work!)
It seems there are enough of those 'tiny bits' in your harness that it ain't as close to 'right' as it ought to be. Saving a few dollars by not having that 'T' connector ~may~ be one of those 'tiny bits'. That coax NOT being as close to 75 ohms as it's thought to be is a much more likely 'catch'! That can vary like you wouldn't believe in the same roll of coax, much less between different rolls. the only sure way of telling is by measuring it each and every time, and that's just not real likely to happen.
So what does all that mess mean? It means your set up still ain't working, and that I screwed up in my thinking that it would never work. Still doesn't work, but I was wrong in the 'why' of it not working.
An awful 'wordy' excuse, right? Yeah, but it's how I had to think it through to see my mistake. Being 'slow' isn't always bad, but it's embarrassing. Sorry 'bout that.
- 'Doc
The Ultimate Resort!
Beat the @#$ thing to death with a hammer and take up knitting!
- A. Einstien