Well, I didn't expect the vitriol over this. A new guy asked a practical question, I tried to answer clearly and simply, from a practical experience perspective. Obviously the theoretical minutia are more important to some than the practical applications.
Please ammend the first paragraph of my original post to read like this:
In the real world, the performance difference between a vertical dipole and a 1/4 wave ground plane is no big deal. There is a definate advantage for the 1/4 wave from a practical view, being that is is much easier to mount in the clear.
I understand that there are people who take the letter of the theories very seriously, and believe their modeling programs over an analyzer--but in the real world where I smolder antennas together, the actually performance of a given antenna counts for more than what the book says it should do.
I hope the OP got what he needed. If not, PM me.
Dave_W6DPS
Dave_W6DPS said:The quarter wave groundplane should work very well, with a minimum of trouble. It will have the same gain as a dipole, but should have a very consistent omni-directional pattern if mounted with nothing around it....
Please ammend the first paragraph of my original post to read like this:
The quarter wave groundplane should work very well, with a minimum of trouble. It should have a fairly consistent omni-directional pattern if mounted with nothing around it....
In the real world, the performance difference between a vertical dipole and a 1/4 wave ground plane is no big deal. There is a definate advantage for the 1/4 wave from a practical view, being that is is much easier to mount in the clear.
I understand that there are people who take the letter of the theories very seriously, and believe their modeling programs over an analyzer--but in the real world where I smolder antennas together, the actually performance of a given antenna counts for more than what the book says it should do.
I hope the OP got what he needed. If not, PM me.
Dave_W6DPS