That may have been true in 1995 but I guess it depends what system you're familiar with. Unless you still have dial up internet a cross reference search only takes a fraction of a second.
2001 or so. I didn’t say I hadn’t used online resources. Cross-reference wasn’t mentioned as THE reason behind a print catalog search set. There are other crossings based on part type.
Parallels, such as a Chevrolet part being looked at for a Dodge. Shock absorbers were one area (rebound & compression rates versus outer dimensions plus mount type). A part might get modified, or the car itself.
Searches of this sort go faster with paper. It’s not the single item, it’s the comparisons.
New questions arise sooner, and can be answered faster.
Let’s make up something: (tires would be a better example) In the case of an engine-driven accessory belt, sure, one wants to know pulley diameter. The belt
series. Change things, and a host of problems
can emerge. Hypothetically, the original series part number was already service-marginal (move to a higher HP engine; or a truck-version
higher-duty rating) and a different belt series required. Etc (that sort of problem)
So, not just length, or width. First step has always seemed to be acquisition of cross-reference. And then locating suppliers.
Some belts are “cheap”. Some are nothing of the sort. Once the engine is turned over and run, the belt can’t be returned.
In a more direct answer
had I the ability to keep several screens open simultaneously, the same search type can be done. Albeit at a great deal more expense.
Typing isn’t fast.
Computer searches are only fast for those without facility or expertise in other search types. For GP purposes they’re okay.
The second part of being “friends” at the Napa DC was that I could (finally) request a stock pick and make physical examination. Pay restock (rare) when several part numbers came out to the front counter.
That ended my day at the DC.
Usually I’d reach a point of calling the manufacturer. Got lucky on occasion to talk with an actual engineer, Though there were reps well-versed for my type of questions more often or not. I’d also “walk up to” the world of racing where a specialty supplier would be mentioned. I might know if them or not.
Paper isn’t replaced by electrons for speed. Computers exist for themselves (needs override ostensible service offered).
A whoppin’ Super HD alternator swap “could” engender more trouble than its worth. I don’t think it will.
Its the TYPE of search at hand where the non-stock application shows how shitty is computer-dependence.
I’d say this is where computers seem worthwhile: looking for who may have done it before.
Creates it’s own problems, and then offers “remediation”.
.