I am still working with them, I want to make at least a Maco ring style matching network that I can tune, at lest to a point, I am concerned about the tap points, their won't be as many as there are on the actual antennas. I also don't have the capacitance of the hidden, if you will, built in capacitor on that antenna design. I don't think this capacitor would be required to make a functioning model, but it would be useful in comparing an antenna design with and without said capacitor.
I also want to expand the I-10K/Shockwave model some. I want to give the ends of the matching section more of a curve rather than just be straight up and down. I think that will lessen the skewing some, but not eliminate it. Weather or not the skewing exists on the actual model isn't in question to me, the question is how much. Not that anyone would notice the small amount of skewing most of the models are showing.
I've added the curve to the matching section of the I-10K/Shockwave model, there was effectively no difference. I also oriented the radials on the axis instead of offset 45 degrees, again no real change.
I made a first run of a ring type matching network, like the Maco, but with no capacitor, it only had eight wires in the ring, and by extension 8 tap points on said ring. One of those tap points had a tuned SWR low of 1.6. The pattern, at least at this point, is also not as skewed as the I-10K/Shockwave model. Compared to the I-10K/Shockwave model, one side has more gain and the other has less, the tapped ring design seems to be more consistent. I don't know if that will change as I add more wires to the ring and, by extension, get a tap point that has a better match.
The DB