Hogs, huh?
A
genuine battle rifle, with minute-of-man capability might be the ticket.
The old saying was that:
— the Germans built a hunting rifle
(K98 Mauser)
— the Americans built a target rifle
(Springfield 1903-A3)
— But the British built a battle rifle
(Lee-Enfield No. 4 Mk. 1)
The last version was:
Ishapore 2A1 Enfield
(7.62x51 NATO)
1963-1975
View attachment 37279
10-12 round magazine.
Optimal was 145-gr cartridge.
(7.62x51 M80 FMJ boat-tail)
Now, to
meat on the bone
View attachment 37280
A pig sticker
44” rifle plus 15” bayonet and arm extension equals about a 6’ spear to poke “dead things” (one chambered and trigger finger ready).
1). Despite the spray-and-pray advocates with their poodle-shooters, 7.62
eliminates cover.
What? They’re gonna call in artillery, air strikes or lob mortar rounds? Get ‘er dun is to run what ya brung.
2). Downrange energy-transfer is unquestioned versus 5.56.
3). Planetary 7.62/.308 availability is high unlike 30.06. Receiver is up to commercial .308 (antique Springfield’s and Garands aren’t up to today’s commercial 30.06)
4). Closed action keeps reliability highest. (unlike Garand or M14). Cocks on close.
5).
Aimed fire isn’t faster with blowback-operated to justify latter (except where
pallets of rounds are deliverable). The aimed-fire
record is something like 28-rounds per minute.
6). 30.06 equivalents in recoil ARE the limit for sustained use.
Now
The Germans had quite a thing hunting boar with spears into the current era.
I’d like my “spear” to have a surprise in store.
View attachment 37281
Let’s keep
that potentially wild, woolly, Wally-story out of the running.
Hear that, GGW?
Only a bolt-action “spear” for hog-huntin’ along the Arkansas.
A big ol’ iron-sighted rifle with a
serious business end.
Per the zombie invasion, swinging that club will clear a path back to high ground.
A battle rifle can stand up to use that wrecks a typical hunters firearm.
Now, on to breeding Plott Hounds . . . .
.