My Heathkit DX-60B sounds nothing less than fantastic on AM when driven with a Sennheiser MD-421 microphone thru an Altec-Lansing mike preamp.
I like the transmit audio of my Kenwood TS-520, and use it with W2IHY gear. It is much bassier than any of my other rigs, so I have to crank the EQ down quite a bit. Still want to add a 830S to the shack...
CK, where should I listen for the AM guys? I understand there are some real nice sounding stations out there on old equipment.
73,
Brett
In the AM portions of the bandplan- at the band edge..
Having good sounding AM audio in my opinion is sad..
We aren't supposed to broadcast, and the money you wasted on that equipment could have been better spent buying a more modern rig.
520 and 830 is ancient technology..
In the AM portions of the bandplan- at the band edge..
Having good sounding AM audio in my opinion is sad..
We aren't supposed to broadcast, and the money you wasted on that equipment could have been better spent buying a more modern rig.
520 and 830 is ancient technology..
I like the transmit audio of my Kenwood TS-520, and use it with W2IHY gear. It is much bassier than any of my other rigs, so I have to crank the EQ down quite a bit. Still want to add a 830S to the shack...
CK, where should I listen for the AM guys? I understand there are some real nice sounding stations out there on old equipment.
73,
Brett
The problem is that most people think they need a full rack of gear when in fact they have no clue what is needed and use money to compensate for a lack of knowledge.
In the AM portions of the bandplan- at the band edge..
Having good sounding AM audio in my opinion is sad..
We aren't supposed to broadcast, and the money you wasted on that equipment could have been better spent buying a more modern rig.
520 and 830 is ancient technology..
520 and 830 is ancient technology..
CK I totally agree, my 101ZD runs cirules around my 706MKIIG. Reciever is better, TX is better and operation is better (no menus!). The 706 is a great rig but the 30 year old Yaesu is better.And yet they still manage to sound better and have a better receiver than most modern radios. Go figure. I have a "modern radio" and the TS-820S has better TX audio without any mods or add ons and the receiver will stand up to adjacent signals better. It has a REAL RF speech processor too instead of the inferior audio type processors that modern radios have. It may lack the WARC bands and memories but all in all it is a better performer.
And yet they still manage to sound better and have a better receiver than most modern radios. Go figure. I have a "modern radio" and the TS-820S has better TX audio without any mods or add ons and the receiver will stand up to adjacent signals better. It has a REAL RF speech processor too instead of the inferior audio type processors that modern radios have. It may lack the WARC bands and memories but all in all it is a better performer.
I a I can appreciate all the bells and whistles of some of the new rigs, but what sounds best to me is what matters most. My TS520 that I purchased for 125 bucks has been one of the best additions to my shack!
73,
Brett