Imteresting read, I'm pretty new here so go easy haha...
If anyone has access to QST magazine(if you're an arrl member) or arrl.org (non member area/no paywall) there used to be a monthly section on FCC enforcement.
I think its still there.
Anyway, it shows some of the things they are doing that are higher profile cases.
Personally, I think the FCC is more interested in being an auctioneer than an enforcement authority. Maybe they like that lobbyist money a little too much? ATT and Verizon know how to grease their skids.
The main thing I wanted to point out though is the process for FCC regulations.
They use a process called "notice and comment". This is a standard way of introducing rules, regulations etc in goverment and a lot of larger corporations have adopted similar processes through a "peer review" type scenario.
What that means is they come up with something and introduce it as a proposal, they then release it publicly for comment. The comments are taken into comsideration and the original proposal is either put in place as is, amended for further discussion, or amended and put in place. You have a say in every rule provided the comment has merit.
Oh and no, I'm not an FCC employee, laywer, or anything related so if I messed up my interpretation sorry. Not trying to be a know it all, Just that I've been a ham for years and I've helped out some local agencies in the past and read up a lot on this in the past. I'm an engineer so I get the technical, but the legal sometimes twists me up just like any other mere mortal...
I think originally the reasons for no amps on CB were in good spirit.
When the testing for ham radio was actually valid it meant you knew how to not interfere with others from your too wide signal, over modulated signal, splattering signal etc... It also meant you knew enough to not kill yourself opening your amp up(yes people do die from plate voltage) or start a fire because that 130 ft long antenna is drapped across a bunch of dead leaves in a branch or you know a little about the exposure of transmitting 1500 watts through that beam sitting directly level and aimed right at the neighbors 2nd floor bedroom 15 feet away.. haha.
I also have seen the same patterns everyone else has, where at least on the ham bands, the FCC has really taken the "self police" term to heart. They used to have field offices and teams that would work locally with law enforcement and citizens with complaints. Now a days I don't think they even bother. I have a friend who read me a ticket/notification of violation he got from an "official observer" for transmitting oit of band. Seriously? yeah, apparently he had his transmit set 4k wide on ssb (essb) and was right at the top of 80 meters. This official observer is just some clown with a sense of self importance and I don't think the letter was worth anything other than a good thing to use to wipe yr a$$ with.
Ok thats the longest post I've ever made on a forum so dont think I'll be that long winded. Didn't post it to offend anyone so don't take it that way, I can be just as wrong as anyone but it is all from real experiences or things I've read right off the FCC's pages.