Truth is; I hadn't changed a thing in my setup - other than disconnecting the previous radio from the power supply and antenna and plugging this one in. I can't give a definitive answer to that; I can only speculate as you did that it is somewhat cleaner. In either event, I have to put it in my car yet. I have to go to HRO today and get a 'power' pole in order to do so."In fact, this radio didn't interfere with my computer at all. All of my other radios would shut off my mouse and keyboard due to 'splattering' and proximity to the equipment. This radio did not, and I found that surprisingly refreshing as well."
going by the two reviews of those radios on this forum the 257 HP seems to be a cleaner transmitting radio than the omegaforce HP .
unless operator error was the cause of the issues above .
Well; that's hardly a reason to put down the radio itself. Had it been a fault of the radio - then I would be compelled to change that rating.i would have thought mentioning that in the omegas review would have been noteworthy . in my opinion it seems to conflict with your conclusion of the omegaforce HP when you said "The only criticism that comes to mind - is that Sam Lewis needs to make more of these radios available to the public."
it also would have kept it from getting 5 stars in my opinion .
but ....... opinions are like butt holes ..... everybody has one
Truth is; I hadn't changed a thing in my setup - other than disconnecting the previous radio from the power supply and antenna and plugging this one in...................
Well; that's hardly a reason to put down the radio itself. Had it been a fault of the radio - then I would be compelled to change that rating.
I can see that both of these radios have very sensitive receives. In fact, the 99V is just as noisy as the 257 if one does not turn on the Noise Blanketer circuit. Likewise, they can get great reception without even registering S-units. Not many radios can do this well; but these radios both share this in common. Regardless if one likes or dislikes either of these radios; their receive performance - IMO - is at/near the top of the heap.
Overall, the Magnum 257 HP delivered top grade SSB performance between these two radios. To be fair with the Galaxy, it worked very well on SSB ONLY when it was set on that mode and used for about 10 minutes. I don't know why that is true; it is a solid-state device. If the reference chrystal in the Galaxy is at fault; then that is something that they should have done right in the first place. On the other hand, the Magnum gets top scores due to the CPU-controlled VCO that locks SSB much like a pit-bull tied with an ship anchor chain. Turn the Magnum on - cold and right out of the box - and it will not move or drift that can be noticed whatsoever...
You gotta figure the "paint-shaker test" is upcoming
I remember a full page Ad, seems like about a hundred years ago.. of a Royce Mobile radio in a Paint shaker...blured from the movment..i think it was transmitting and the caption was how well the Royce radios were built........
73
Jeff
Got my camcorder working for a SSB test as well. It fell off the tripod yesterday and won't record video anymore but still picks up the audio although not as well as it did before.
YouTube - SSB Audio Comparison RCI-2950DX vs Magnum 257 HP