• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

Base Marconi's1/2 wave J-Pole an alternative viewpoint

Henry, I read your whole post and understood what you said.

What did I say that suggested to you that I need to re-read your words again?

Do you think I misunderstand something you posted?

IMO, Homer was just making a little joke at my expense...and hopefully I understand his humor in that. Did you miss the humor?

i remember some measurements....its not that hard to measure the amount of choke. And i was astonished (?) by the measurements provided.

I'm curious as to what measurements you're referencing here?

I always said to the "clients" tape it to the boom ...you will be fine.. only to find out..that is not the case (im a bit "wants best...oversecured...need to have that said hihi)

I think we all probably want what is best for us individually. IMO, it's trying to figure out what is best.
 
Marconi, I'm glad that that fixed the problem you were having. You essentially made a makeshift inductor, which, like on an antenna, will change the electrical length of the outside of the feed line to a length that did not cause said problems. I'm happy that it fixed your issue, but that is not a choke, however much it resembles one to some people. What you did can be a two way street, in one installation it may fix a CMC issue, while in another doing that can actually cause a CMC issue that didn't exist before. The difference between what you are talking about and a properly designed choke is the choke won't have the potential problem of adding CMC's to the feed line if it wasn't needed to begin with.


The DB
 
What you did can be a two way street, in one installation it may fix a CMC issue, while in another doing that can actually cause a CMC issue that didn't exist before.

DB, when I was shown how to mitigate CMC using Eznec by another Eznec user...I asked lots of questions too and I haven't heard another word from him since. He either did not like to be questioned, or he didn't have any answers...I believe it was a little of both.

The difference between what you are talking about and a properly designed choke is the choke won't have the potential problem of adding CMC's to the feed line if it wasn't needed to begin with.

Steve, I've posted other models with this idea of a choke before...I'm surprised you haven't said something already.

Yes, I have also heard that chokes are transparent. However on a real antenna, when I added a choke to a feed line before, and the antenna was not at or near a perfect match...I sometimes saw issues on my antenna analyzer. So, in that case the transparency was out.

I checked the idea I use plenty of times before I published a model using the idea. In the majority of cases the idea worked, but sometimes it did little or nothing...so then I
reasoned this...it seemed to fit with what some of the naysayers were claiming about coaxial chokes.

I'm open for better solutions to the issues I run into with modeling antennas and you've been helpful in the past. Could you show me how you make the perfect choke that does what you claim here?

If you have a J-Pole model that might be interesting too.

I would also like to hear some comments on the idea I posted earlier for a FIX on the Starduster model using 2 isolating devices on the -80* degree model you showed us in your recent video. Hopefully you have modeled that simple approach already.

Thanks for your comments.
 
Last edited:
When it comes to modeling, a deep study of chokes is on my list of things to do. From a post I made above...

I once did some modeling examining choke locations and cmc's flowing on feed lines/masts, I think it was for Homerbb. It was far from complete, and I have gotten some new ideas to try since then, such as the 1/4 wavelength stub on the mast idea mentioned above, and shown in one form or another on this forum recently. I just haven't had the time lately, but it is something I intend to do at some point.

I have made statements on chokes multiple times, and have talked about this to some small extent, typically when someone links to one of K3DAV's web page of mis-information. The one in question is where he says any coil of wire in a coax will act like a choke. This is not true in his case, and it is not true in your case.

It has occurred to me that we might be defining what a choke is differently. When it comes to what I consider a choke I limit myself to devices that I can take unaltered and apply it to all antennas of the same frequency, and get the same result. I do not believe that you can say for certain that that will happen in the case you have pictures of above, although I am always happy to look at evidence to the contrary.

Let me be clear, I believe that you did have the experience you claim and it worked in that specific case as you have claimed. I have no reason to doubt this. I am sorry, however, but you cannot guarantee that with what you are picturing above, that you could remove it from this antenna setup and put it unaltered into any and every other antenna setup of the same frequency range and have it always have this effect. Because of this I cannot call it a choke, and in fact have to limit myself to to the possibility of this being a lucky occurrence. I caution you that I have actual experience of simply routing a coax differently causing a similar effect to what you experienced to happen, but you don't see me calling that a choke do you?

I don't recall seeing your modeling data on this, and I feel I must ask, did you try to duplicate a circumstance where adding such a device actually made a problem worse, or even created a problem?

I am going to ignore your naysayers comment. What a choke can and can't do is well defined, at least to me. Many many people have their own stories of things that they attribute to chokes that they have created that aren't actually chokes. So they put up an antenna and made a choke like device and didn't have common mode currents, good for them. At least in your case you had a problem that you fixed along the way, which is far more credible in my eyes. Also, be very careful about using that word, naysayer. More often than not it is used by people trying to put forth a myth they believe, and say people who have either a different experience or actual facts that doesn't tow their line don't know what they are talking about. It isn't very effective imho.

As I have stated recently, I have lost my collection of models, I don't have a j-pole or even insert whatever antenna here model to grab and play with. I also don't think that I need modeling to explain every little thing, and what is and is not a choke is one of those things. If it is really that important to you then hopefully I will get to it eventually, after all see my quote of myself above.

I have modeled multiple chokes on an antenna before, but not on that model. It was, again, the previous work I did for HomerBB. I did make the statement that sometimes multiple chokes may be needed and I talked about when and why.

Somehow I missed one of your first remarks, namely about chokes being transparent. I agree and disagree with this wording based on specific cases. If their are no CMC's to begin with then the choke will be transparent. If their were lots of CMC's then the choke will definitely have an effect. If CMC's are somewhere in between then you will get a result that is somewhere in between. I think one of my previous comments could be interpreted to say something along the lines of being transparent, but it is definitely not what I meant. Their is a distinct difference between being transparent and not causing CMC's.

And finally, if you want more information regarding devices that I call chokes, then go here. His chart is often linked on these forums, and if a good reference if you want to make a coax choke that you know for sure will work on certain frequencies. He also go on to what, why, and how he got this data.


The DB
 
Boy Howdy!

I asked for a tip or two of help in understanding...and I get a meaningless lecture.
 
Last edited:
Henry, I read your whole post and understood what you said.

What did I say that suggested to you that I need to re-read your words again?

Do you think I misunderstand something you posted?

IMO, Homer was just making a little joke at my expense...and hopefully I understand his humor in that. Did you miss the humor?

I'm curious as to what measurements you're referencing here?

I think we all probably want what is best for us individually. IMO, it's trying to figure out what is best.

Well... I wasn't suggesting you were reading things wrong. I was suggesting result with RFI and coax are not "always clear".... Just like you experienced. Sorry if I gave you that idea....We agree (i think hihi)

You can measure the amount of "choke" using for example a minivna. Not many do that ...but it is easy to do. The amount of "choke" (impedance) variees more than i expected.....i mean....1 turn does make a difference ( thats why i often stated "dont read hamunivers with its ugly balun 8 turns 10cm diameter...thats wrong...I know and results can be reproduced ...so its a fact. By the way there is large influence from other things like attaching it to a mast, more then i expected.... it is rather critical. Hope that clarifies things ? 73s H.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bob85 and HomerBB

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • @ kopcicle:
    If you know you know. Anyone have Sam's current #? He hasn't been on since Oct 1st. Someone let him know I'm looking.
  • dxBot:
    535A has left the room.
  • @ AmericanEagle575:
    Just wanted to say Good Morning to all my Fellow WDX members out there!!!!!