Right now I'm using a 2m/70cm mag-mount in the center of my 4Runner's roof. Obviously the best install would be to drill the roof, but I am loath to do so. The guy at HRO told me that any hard connection to the vehicle would be better than the mag-mount, and I asked him about the tail-light mounting that some guys do and he agreed it would be better.
Guess I'm having trouble understanding... seems to me that a mag-mount with a good counterpoise in the center of the roof would have good omni-directional coverage. I'm not opposed to attaching a bracket in the tail-light area and running in through the tail-light, but it seems counter-intuitive to me since even with a larger antenna much of it will be below the roof-line for all directions except the rear.
Thoughts?
Guess I'm having trouble understanding... seems to me that a mag-mount with a good counterpoise in the center of the roof would have good omni-directional coverage. I'm not opposed to attaching a bracket in the tail-light area and running in through the tail-light, but it seems counter-intuitive to me since even with a larger antenna much of it will be below the roof-line for all directions except the rear.
Thoughts?