Pick your flavor of truck, WS, KW, Mack, Pete, all new factory antenna systems are crappie to say the least. I’ve tested many with an AA 35, doing an SWR scan, the best I’ve come by are 2.5, the worst 50. Resonance is in the low 26 MHz range.
The standard issue is dual antennas where the stud is mounted in plastic or mounted to an ungrounded mirror bracket with reference to the rest of the vehicle. The two pieces of each antenna coax are not a quarter wavelength, terminated in male Motorola connectors, sometimes rg 59, sometimes 58, sometimes connected to a multiplexor.
The fix is simple, some are a more pain in the ass, but simple, nonetheless. A single grounded antenna angled forward slightly (if necessary to get away from those 10 by 114 stacks, 5 airhorns, 14” reverse bowtie) and new 50 ohm coax. Not backing any antenna producers here, but minimum 3’ or coil above the roof line, and the range of SWR is 1.3 to 1.8 with resonance closer to 27 MHz.
My question is: Are they attempting to use the coax feed as a counterpoise similar to no ground antenna systems (if they are, even that is being done incorrectly)? What am I missing to understand their approach?
The standard issue is dual antennas where the stud is mounted in plastic or mounted to an ungrounded mirror bracket with reference to the rest of the vehicle. The two pieces of each antenna coax are not a quarter wavelength, terminated in male Motorola connectors, sometimes rg 59, sometimes 58, sometimes connected to a multiplexor.
The fix is simple, some are a more pain in the ass, but simple, nonetheless. A single grounded antenna angled forward slightly (if necessary to get away from those 10 by 114 stacks, 5 airhorns, 14” reverse bowtie) and new 50 ohm coax. Not backing any antenna producers here, but minimum 3’ or coil above the roof line, and the range of SWR is 1.3 to 1.8 with resonance closer to 27 MHz.
My question is: Are they attempting to use the coax feed as a counterpoise similar to no ground antenna systems (if they are, even that is being done incorrectly)? What am I missing to understand their approach?