• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

Opinions on using computers for decoding and encoding CW

I never used a computer for CW, but I once had a CW / RTTY keyboard with a separate decoder driving a black and white TV monitor. That setup was somewhat popular before computers replaced them. It was challenging for me because I never was a very good typist (self taught with limited practice). Guys using them would program their keyboards for 35wpm or more and expect others to do the same. To keep a steady CW flow you needed to stay just ahead of the buffer (very small amount of memory in those old keyboards). My true colors were given away every time I ran out of buffer. :(

As a Vibroplex bug user for years, I understand the concept of emphasis. The common term was once called “fist”. Was having a different fist more difficult to copy? That really depended upon how far off from the norm the CW was sent. When dit spacing is sent 3 or 4 times faster than dashes, you’re too radical for many operators to discern. It’s similar to all the different English language accents. Most accents are easy to understand, some are difficult. Bugs are great when properly adjusted and will give you a signature others may recognize, yet still be able to copy without difficulty. I later modified my bug by adding a “dasher” circuit. The dash paddle then became automatic and adjustable just like a keyer. Since the swiper part or dit paddle on a bug's spacing is sent very fast (even at its lowest weight setting) than one usually sends dashes, the dasher circuit helped balance it out. This was just a cheap way to create the same effect of having a modern keyer. Nowadays I use both a Bencher paddle and a straight key. Going back to my roots I often use my novice rig with a straight key, now more than ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shadetree Mechanic
Was having a different fist more difficult to copy?
Back when bugs and straight keys were far more common I just got used to hearing them and could "interpret" more styles or vagaries in keying. Some locals that I heard a lot I could tell who it was by their fist and signal strength. It can be kinda distinctive..

I remember in a CW contest a couple years ago hearing someone high in the band on 15 calling CQ (con)test. Good steady signal strength so may have been local. His sending was so bad I could never pick out what his call was. Couldn't hardly tell dits from dahs and the spacing was all screwed up and inconsistent. Tried listening a few different times but never did get his call. Worst I ever heard in 48 years. Far worse than the old Russian stations with all the chirp and drift!! Not sure how computer software would deal with that!

Our brains can deal with a lot of the vagaries in CW. Chirp, drift, bumped VFO knobs, CW in Aurora openings with essentially no tone, bad keying, bug swing, QRM on the same frequency and a lot of other things. It takes some experience though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Shadetree Mechanic
Banana boat swing;
How about "Great Lakes Swing" heard many...referring to Old Navy ops...taught CW at Great Lakes Navel near Chicago...still a few left around, not near as many as 30 years ago:(

Note to those using "Readers":
Those ops using straight keys, bugs, cotie's etc.
Your "reader" will most likely see, lot's of strange words, messages.
Those are made to "COPY" PERFECT Morse!
My Elmer would almost always "Test" and op with a little "swing" while working them.
He thought it was "cheating"...so their readers would see LOT's of "T's"..."E's" etc or just plain garbage!:ROFLMAO:
And those that don't think "personality" can exist while transmitting Morse...well! guess you never learned as I did, sending on a straight key or from some old Navy op's "Bug".:LOL:
When I was operating lot's of CW on regular basis(not lately)...I could pick certain op's out on the bands before I even heard their calls or name...Just by the "swing" in their step...
So to speak:rolleyes::D
All the Best
Gary
 
Far worse than the old Russian stations with all the chirp and drift!! Not sure how computer software would deal with that!

Yepper: You could pick those old Russian stations out easily...That 90 cycle AC/240 volt they ran for supply voltage made a very distinct sound. Cuba ran similar supply voltage.
Also getting use to the difference in spelling translation comes into play.
Sweden(US spelling) in their translation sends Sveden …
OLD Russian, Their "C's were US "R's" … their are other examples...W's were also different...US spelling city of MOSCOW...they send Moskava … Scandinavians have same kinds of spelling differences... Wait till a code reader tries to pick out some of the Icelandic city spellings :)
Great fun
All the Best
Gary

So when using a computer to copy code...never use with AUTO spell check turned on... you may receive messages no where close to what the DX station truly sent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shadetree Mechanic

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • dxBot:
    Greg T has left the room.
  • @ BJ radionut:
    EVAN/Crawdad :love: ...runna pile-up on 6m SSB(y) W4AXW in the air
    +1
  • @ Crawdad:
    One of the few times my tiny station gets heard on 6m!:D
  • @ Galanary:
    anyone out here familiar with the Icom IC-7300 mods