• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

Petition FCC to Increase Legal Limit of CB Power

With today’s economy, couples shouldn’t even consider having kids unless they are financially capable of sustaining at least one full time disciplinarian at home.
I heard one individual talking about requiring a license to reproduce. I looked at them and said,"I hope you realize that YOU probably would not be sitting here if that was the case." Did not go over very well with him. Most of the disciplinary problems are from single parent homes. I have a friend who retired after teaching for 35 years said if she was at the start of her career she would have quit a long time ago because of the discipline problems.

My apologies to the Original Poster for participating in the hi-jacking of this thread.
 
Last edited:
Since D.B Cooper has clearly boarded this thread and not yet exited, I'll put in my two cents worth. Wish the "system" was something we could put our hands around and strangle, but it's not. It's too darn big. It's comprised of teachers, administrators, lawmakers, and a great many parents who support it for their listless children and it encompasses not only the "Everyone who participates is a winner and gets a medal" mentality Tallman referenced above but also the history books re-writers, the "Don't you dare lay a hand on my child" parents and the "We need more bathrooms" folks as well. The "system" is a gigantic, shape-changing entity run amok that likely cannot and will not ever be fixed. I say likely because it's too depressing to think otherwise. :(
 
Morning.jpg
When both parents are required to hold down several jobs to make ends meet, parenting can no longer be a priority. With today’s economy, couples shouldn’t even consider having kids unless they are financially capable of sustaining at least one full time disciplinarian at home. Gone are the days of the common family farm. Gone are the days when the average man made enough money, so the wife could watch over the kids. Those family freedoms were lost years ago. Anybody win the Mega Millions yet?

If I can give out likes like the Mega-Millions - all of you would share the wealth with me...

I'm glad to see this type of post, for it addresses many issues todays' Millennial's have forgotten or ignored and yet - C'est la vie - parenting skills seem to be a lost art. You think this is easy on the rest of us?

We've seen programs like CPS come into play, and literally take the play right out of the fabric of family. Are the days of neighbor helping neighbor fading as distant dream? Is it, at the same time, taken the ability of allowing the neighbors to help raise the children of those neighbors? Does anyone remember? Has everyone forgotten how to obtain the skills they needed to maintain and support the community? We helped each other.

It used to be; that to be successful you waited to have a family knowing that as a single individual - how hard it is to survive in a cruel and insensitive world. Now, there may be some sense of community, but it may need to be refined into a definition of commiseration and platonic, cationic states of being - nothing to do except to live, and to do that, their hands reach out for services we only wished we had. But, even in the 1990's just less than two decades ago, we worked, survived within our means and lived without. Something happened.

When you take parents out of the home and into the workforce to obtain the standard of living they once had - I don't think that is the correct story. It's more like the needy child in the family is unable to process the family function because of the social needs take precedent over the needs of the very child you're exposing it to.

Now the parents need to forage for wealth and income to sustain the childs' insatiable desire to be more that it is, but to become that, it needs to find itself and how it can fit into the world. Not the other way around.

How does this fit the FCC requirement?

Well, we listened to radio - that wireless wonder - then TV then we had Cell onto Smartphones. Now our entire lives can be spent in one room visiting others in a Virtual world that is far less stressful and goes against our own innate nature to explore our environment. We lose our way to learn the very skills we need to socialize, communicate and become productive members to a means of country and nation to support itself and provide the world with an example of living we only once dreamed about. In the physical world.

Ok, now we need to explore why we need more power - or did we just get lazy and forget to remember our past and how we got here?

Now, I'm not going to drag you all thru the Garden of Grief and Sidewalks of Sorrow, we can do that ourselves in our own time - when were not buried in our headsets and tiny phone screens - it may take a while to get out of that niche - but the sooner the better.

Here's the stark reality - there is always a bigger fish.

We have seen the lackadaisical attitudes of the FCC towards the individuals that were bullied by the bigger fishes in the sea. What does that tell you? It means the biggest fish that is responsible for your ability to even have a radio let alone talk on it, does not care for you - or your bully - it's too big to care.

So there's' the crux of the problem - why do you need more power - because others have done it and taken your rights of QRP or simplex - away from you and those like you?

I guess we NEED to discuss this...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redbeard U812
Does anyone know the maximum CB Antenna height that the FCC will allow? I live in Florida and I think it is 60 feet but I am uncertain. By Gregg L. Friedman MD
 
60 feet above average terrain height.

Now if you mean BASE of the antenna height or TOP of antenna height - opinions vary...

But I do know that "elevation" of terrain in the area of the antenna does play a role - because you can live in a valley or hillside yet qualify to have the antenna higher than 60 feet - due to AVERAGE height of terrain in the area (vicinity) - so if your location is say "Hell Michigan"...
HellMiDetails.jpg
Yes, it does exist - But uses Pinckney MI Post Office​

Take a look at the elevation figure - you have that to use for your baseline.

Gotta put in this disclaimer...

There are several factors regarding the clause...

20 feet when attached to a building/house...

60 feet from ground - means FREE STANDING

20 feet above tree height - again they don't specify you putting it in a tree either...nor so they specify the height of the trees in question - so if you have 80 to 100' foot tall trees, then putting an antenna in one, let alone to reach over them - you're allowed 20' above as long as it's on the tree...as in not connected to a house - or if it is up from the ground - only 60 feet free standing - in a tree - your height matters...
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know the maximum CB Antenna height that the FCC will allow? I live in Florida and I think it is 60 feet but I am uncertain. By Gregg L. Friedman MD

Go to this link: https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/bureau-divisions/mobility-division/citizens-band-radio-service-cbrs

Click on the "Operations" tab and you'll find this text:

For structures, the highest point of your antenna must not be more than 20 feet above the highest point of the building or tree on which it is mounted, or 60 feet above the ground. There are lower height limits if your antenna structure is located within two miles of an airport.
 
There is a lot of pressure on the schools to close the achievement gap. So naturally people think "they are going to bring the low kids up". Unfortunately it is much easier to bring the top kids down. My wife is a school teacher, I could stand on this soap box all day.

But if you fell off the soapbox there'd be a lawsuit and things would get really confusing.

They have DUMBED the schools down so much in Kentucky that a diploma is just a participation certificate. Now any job worthwhile requires at least two years of college.

I've always heard Murray had some great public schools because of the affiliation with MSU while schools a district or two over were awful. Is it really any different than any other state?
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • dxBot:
    Greg T has left the room.
  • @ BJ radionut:
    EVAN/Crawdad :love: ...runna pile-up on 6m SSB(y) W4AXW in the air
    +1
  • @ Crawdad:
    One of the few times my tiny station gets heard on 6m!:D
  • @ Galanary:
    anyone out here familiar with the Icom IC-7300 mods