This isn't a subject that matters to many but here's something
View attachment 41704 that might help some of you techs out there. The famed rt1 is an IRFZ24N underneath. The source I received the unmarked RT1 transistors from got a new batch from their supplier so he sent a few over and this is what was received. Maybe they figured somebody would eventually find out what they were so they let the cat out of the bag.
This isn't a subject that matters to many but here's something
View attachment 41704 that might help some of you techs out there. The famed rt1 is an IRFZ24N underneath. The source I received the unmarked RT1 transistors from got a new batch from their supplier so he sent a few over and this is what was received. Maybe they figured somebody would eventually find out what they were so they let the cat out of the bag.
Mr Eldo...
This isn't a subject that matters to many but here's something
View attachment 41704 that might help some of you techs out there. The famed rt1 is an IRFZ24N underneath. The source I received the unmarked RT1 transistors from got a new batch from their supplier so he sent a few over and this is what was received. Maybe they figured somebody would eventually find out what they were so they let the cat out of the bag.
This isn't a subject that matters to many but here's something
View attachment 41704 that might help some of you techs out there. The famed rt1 is an IRFZ24N underneath. The source I received the unmarked RT1 transistors from got a new batch from their supplier so he sent a few over and this is what was received. Maybe they figured somebody would eventually find out what they were so they let the cat out of the bag.
HI Mr Eldo... I had been, a few days ago, messaging w/nomad re: RT1 & I had more questions but no further comments so I thought it was how my phone doesn't play too great w/this forum or some other reason caused my post to not make it here, but now I see it did.. In any event I'd like to take this up with you a bit as you are the only one I so far could find, to state what the RT1's are and I want to throw in a couple thoughtz I had about it and also ask for a little help on a repair. My thinking is that is companies like Ranger decide to choose some transistor to use and buff the #s off & restamp with RT1 or whatever, well, when you think about it, anyone could be using whatever mosfet they want, assuming it's a workable drop in and stamp whatever they want on it and no one is the keener as to what is actually underneath, right? I don't know if Ranger is rebranding the RT1 as per any agreement they might have with the manufacturer, or if they're just doing it cuz they can? Nor if any such agreement is even legally necessary? So if they can do it anyone can and DO the same... Add to it, I have a set of blown RT1's. I say RT1's, because the radio came from Ranger w/them installed & they say "RT1" on the devices. Of course that doesn't mean that somewhere along the line substitutions were or weren't made. And these blown RT1's have what I call a really crummy RT1 stamp on them. Obviously the orig manufacturers stamp buffed out and stamped RT1 using a very cheap, almost child's toy stamp. And...looking at the set of 8 that I pulled from this radio, it's obvious that not all the stamps are even close to being equal in quality. I'm attaching a good ex of this from 3 of them I picked out where 1 has a fairly decentooking stamp, although still far short of what you'd expect professionally from Ranger and the other 2, to me, look like they were stamped by a McDonald's toy, no exaggeration. So once I saw that and spoke to my supplier for replacement parts, getting his input, is when I came to this realization that regardless of where the rebranded parts come from, ie, Ranger, Barkett, Lesco, wherever, they could be anything from anywhere or anybody and no one the wiser (u less they had 1st hand knowledge or did extensive testing and/or pulled them apart to get to the substrate & actual circuit, using a microscope and looked for telltale signs of its origin. I mean, imagine Ranger sending out to sellers like Barkett, these (see pic) crappily marked mosfets. This means anyone could buy up a bunch of cheap China irf520 for like 10 or 20 cents ea in quantity and easily buff them out and apply the RT1 # on there and sell for say $2 ea. Barkett sells them for $3.
All that said, so then how do you know the ones you got, which are marked as the IRFZ24N are actually what Ranger uses for the RT1? The only supposed supplier I know of is Barkett & maybe Lesco I heard? I don't know which supplier your came from but they initially were unmarked so who knows if they are the same as what Ranger is using? And then your friend sent some more which are the IRFZ24N but how do you know that's what Ranger uses?
Now, the plot thickens...
Before I went and ordered a set from Barkett (eagle one radios), I decided to check with my large American wholesale supplier I've used d for over 20 yrs. I asked if he had any RT1's. He said yes he thought so but needed some more time to check. I thought that was odd but it turned out there was a good reason for that. He had a small quantity listed in his computer system but they didn't seem to be there where they should be in the stock dept. It took a couple days for him to figure it out and get back to me. He then explained that over a year ago he had a request from a texas customer for some RT1's. He didn't have any or know of them so he wound up putting in an order for them, I guess from one of their regular suppliers in China? He was told that the transistors they were sending him were RT1's. He's just a salesman so he was done with it at that point. So I bought a set of what he said were RT1's but then they sent me a digital invoice, it said IRFZ24NPBF on it. I'm like wtf? I became very concerned about it as I had already looked at bells cb N3 YouTube video where it shows the pep at close to 450w. And the owner of the radio told me that before it blew up it was showing over 500 on his meters (no dummy, PDC600 type meter). I told him forget that, no way. But then I saw the bells video w/close to 450. The point is, I don't know what the IRFZ24NPBF were compared to the orig RT1's or what kind of output they had. So I don't know whether to use the IRFZ24NPBF or throw in a set of irf520 vishay or I had a set of 13n10's on hand or maybe just order from Barkett?
I spent the next few days speaking to my supplier, Barkett, Eric Lewis, someone I know from galaxy, the boss at bells cb, etc, trying to find out what the hell the RT1's were and if the IRFZ24NPBF were indeed one & the same. No one knows nothing as you might expect. I learned that it is Ranger & Ranger alone who is rebranding the RT1 from whatever orig mosfet. I sent them an email asking about it and so far and not surprisingly, they haven't replied. Barkett will not divulge anything if they even know and say only that they order their RT1's from Ranger in Malaysia. Mr Lewis is no longer involved w/Ranger and doesnt know what the RT1's actuality are.
Which brings me back to your post which I had actually seen before I ordered my RT1's & then saw the invoice that said irfz24npbf, not RT1... I'm thinking maybe they are irfz24npbf but who knows what anything is anymore when a mega company like Ranger can buff off part #s & put whatever they want on there?
I spent the next several days trying in vain to positively find out what the RT1's actually are and if the IRFZ24NPBF is the same thing. Because I saw the bells cb youtube video of the N3 doing 450w peak and the owner of the N3 I have said b4 it blew up it was doing well over 500 (but that's on his pdc600 type meters w/no dummy). So I didn't want to use irf520 or 13n10's.
I contacted my supplier, Eric Lewis, someone I know from galaxy, the guy from bells cb, Barnett and Ranger. No one know anything or will divulge if they knew Ranger didn't even return my email.
So I decided to go ahead w/the IRFZ24NPBF's & hope for the best. (I had actually seen your post about the IRFZ24N early on, before I saw my invoice but didn't pay much attention to it until I rcvd my irfz24npbf's and all the rest, until today I remembered to go back & try to find your post about the IRFZ24N.
I hoped to have the job done by now but ran into a few addtl problems.... One of the ferrite transformers was toast. I think it's a combiner. And both 100 ohm resistors bad. They are hi heat components (maybe metal oxide?) and both still looked pretty good (except for the stripes changed color). To my surprise, the one on the output side (w/the burnt torroid) was open. The other one was over 200 ohms measured. Using a torroid from a texas star and the resistors they come with.
Ran into the inevitable lifted board pads for the transistors. About 4 of them. My eyes not so great anymore so I'm working on repairing those..
My last problem is the biasing can't find any alignment for this amp board. I was gonna set the gate voltage at around 3.5 v, like most mosfet radios say to do, but I see where nomad says that's wrong way to go & to set the drain current for more accuracy. I heard that Ranger says same thing to do. But I'm not sure of the setting for one thing. I heard it should be 50mA per mosfet & about 400mA total per side but I know that's wrong because the math doesn't add up. Maybe 200mA per side? And also I don't know quite how to measure the current on this amp. I know it's done in series with meter & I know how to do it on radios like a 148/grant/xl & other radios with the pullout jumper board but I don't know how to do it on this amp if there is a special way. I guess it should be done in ssb, unmodulated? I could use some help w/how to...
One last thing is that when I opened up the amp, one of the small plugs was unplugged. I don't know yet what that plug is for or if it is supposed to be unplugged? I can give you the board location if that will help...
Hope you found this post of interest & can help me with the issues I noted.