Wow, you assume a lot... You assumed your contact from 70 miles away was made because of the antenna design, and were (are) wrong. You assumed that I didn't build the antenna you really like because I built other antennas since, and were wrong. You assumed that I didn't use copper tubing, something I didn't mention in my post, and were still wrong. You assumed that just because I didn't keep using that antenna, or immediately go back to using it, that I never actually built one, and was wrong again.
You now assume he has been frustrated because he has multiple different antennas for the same band? Well, all I can recommend here is to stop assuming, its not getting you very far...
You seem to want to say that one antenna is the best possible antenna for all situations. The problem with that line of thinking is there is no one best possible antenna for all situations. I can go through multiple antenna designs, where they excel and where they don't work well. Each antenna has its good points and bad points. One antenna may work great for you, but not well for someone else. How about I give an example, I'll even limit it to vertical antennas to keep is closer to the antenna you think is the best without question...
Situation one, you live in a flat area with no hills. A single longer antenna will be better, but only to a point. Often a collinear array is used here, or multiple antennas in a vertical line fed in phase. This will keep as much of the signal in as flat a region as possible, and give the absolute best range within a local space. Lets look at another possible situation, your atnenna is on top of a mountain and you want to talk to the people in the town/city below. The shorter antennas pattern will cover a wider space, and because of it may allow communications with people in the town/city below, but at the cost of range. If a repeater is set up in such a case, and two collinear elements are being used, they may feed them slightly out of phase to manipulate the pattern to aim it at the town/city below where they want coverage.
Taking it a step further, distance contacts for the 2 meter band are generally made using horizontal polarization. Using a vertical of any kind here puts you at a big disadvantage.
I could go on here...
Based on both my knowledge of how antennas work, and based on, get this, actual experience, it is my opinion that the antenna you are swearing by isn't even the best for your purpose, but then, how would you even know that when you stopped looking at other possibilities? You found an antenna that seems to you to outperform another antenna you had and, without bothering to even try other antennas beyond that, decided that your antenna is automatically the best. When you put this antenna of yours up, you gave up the search. You were an active hobbyist to get that far, then you suddenly stopped.
It is when you are so sure of something in your mind that you don't/won't question it that you are most likely to be wrong. I'm sorry to say, Ironman1956, but this is where you are... I hope you get out this mindset soon and go back to your experimenting ways. You are giving up on your own potential...
The DB