Ummm . . . not entirely true. The ACA has in its lengthy provisions for birth control for which those with Christian ethics would end up subsidizing. It is a contentious point, since it is a part of this package for which many Christians don't abide with. It forces us to subsidize that which is both morally unethical and against God's word in principle, a point which is lost on many people. For this reason alone, many of them will choose refusal to pay into that system and end up paying the yearly penalty fee, as a form of open defiance/protest.
Justme:
There are so many parts to the ACA bill that not even those that oppose or agree with its passage fully understand. To have Congress pass this bill in such a manner as this honestly flies in the face of reason, logic, and common sense. In a true sense, they passed it nearly blind. Used car salesmen show more honesty and concern dealing with the public than those who represented and endorsed this bill.
One point that hasn't been discussed enough is that there has not been enough bipartisan support for the ACA. In fact, none. It was unilaterally passed, which is unprecedented in US history. That will ultimately lead to its failure and retirement of the bill so that it can be re-written to get support from both sides of the aisle. A huge fight - even though it has already passed - is still imminent.
I deal with shill posters on syndicated internet newspaper columns that spout pompous pseudo-liberal ideology all of the time. Who go out of their way to harass and defame the people of the US as a sport as they try to pass themselves off as Americans. Exposing them has been particularly fun to do. You are really no different by suggesting that Americans need to fall asleep at the wheel and float downstream on this subject.
The shills of Iran are easier to spot than the Russians, as their command of English is usually much better than the Iranians on these blogs. Leftovers from the defunct and bitter Soviet Union that have a vengeful axe to grind with the US. They are artful ideologues, and it is their ideology that is the real clue. Which is ultimately hypocritical, since the demise of that communist regime was a diet of bureaucracy and the ideologues that supported it. Socialism was a fool's errand, and there was never a shortage of fools rushing in.
The Soviet Union isn't really dead, it just smells that way.