Its not a matter of having enough radials or not, I doubt it is possible to have enough 1/4 wavelength radials to simulate a perfect ground in the first place.
Here I have a picture of the graphical layout of the model.
Here we have a single 1/4 wavelength vertical element directly attached to the perfect ground. There are no radials because the perfect ground is the radial system in this case.
Now the main screen view which includes the impedance of the antenna's feedpoint.
The impedance here shows an R = 35.9 when X = -0.02.
A few radials are simply not enough to simulate the perfect ground required to get the 35 to 36 ohm impedance...
When it comes to a 1/4 wavelength antenna with 4 radials, I get very close to the same impedance results as you do, and in that case, I agree that those are the results you should get.
You know its strange, I seem to remember you having a discussion with someone, Captain Kilowatt maybe, where he was able to get you to get very close to simulating a 36 ohm impedance for a 1/4 wavelength groundplane using some large number of radials... Maybe I'm mistaken...
The DB
Here I have a picture of the graphical layout of the model.
Here we have a single 1/4 wavelength vertical element directly attached to the perfect ground. There are no radials because the perfect ground is the radial system in this case.
Now the main screen view which includes the impedance of the antenna's feedpoint.
The impedance here shows an R = 35.9 when X = -0.02.
A few radials are simply not enough to simulate the perfect ground required to get the 35 to 36 ohm impedance...
When it comes to a 1/4 wavelength antenna with 4 radials, I get very close to the same impedance results as you do, and in that case, I agree that those are the results you should get.
You know its strange, I seem to remember you having a discussion with someone, Captain Kilowatt maybe, where he was able to get you to get very close to simulating a 36 ohm impedance for a 1/4 wavelength groundplane using some large number of radials... Maybe I'm mistaken...
The DB