• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

The EN369FN mosfet companion CBTricks errors in the drawing and the correction.

Well, we've kinda' been over this...

AM? Doing up a EN1230 for a Cobra 29?

AM AND SSB? Like a Galaxy?

Here's for AM...take it or leave it...but within the first Graphic is the CB Tricks values...369DR and 369FN

IF the '520 is in the FINAL position - then you need Diode 390 tied in series, with ANY value of Resistor being from 470 ohm onto as much as 3.9K across the Diode Resistor combo from Top to ground...

Like this...

And even then, this is arbitrary - because each "setup" is different...
IRF520EKL2030conVUPDTDmod.png
What makes this a problem is how much power is present for swing the operator doing this mod, wants to do with the DRIVER and how much power swing it will have.

Ok, don't go overboard or overthink this...

If you want to install this little EN1230 equivalent - that's fine.

But it needs power to work properly. The above values are approximate ok?
  • there's a problem with the above design. It's set for a limited range of RF power.
They, those Resistor values - change if you have MORE than a 2 watt carrier driving an amp swinging to over 12 watts - works with 2 watts swing to 12 - AS shown.

But if you're running a 4 watts carrier to swing power into a High Drive linear - the above may be way too much in resistive values - reduce those R-Values to 390 (Diode side) and even 2.7K for 4-6 watts of carrier..
  • AGAIN - and I can't stress this enough...there's a problem with the above design. It's set for a limited range of RF power in which to sample and then rectify into a DC level signal the GATE of the '520 can use.
You may be safer to use a straight simple DC biasing scheme instead...
upload_2020-5-10_22-33-50.png
Do up a divider and work within it's resistor pair to generate a tap voltage of about 3.4 ~ 3.7 volts - using two resistors...an 8.2K / 7.5K and 4.7K or 5.2K (not a common values but it is produced) to give you the "preset" voltage the gate can see to just BARELY (READ READY TO) turn on and when RF shows up then it can turn on all the way and amplify.
UNIDEN 678 did something like it...
Uniden687DrivrFinal.jpg
Also - as a measure of SAFETY - use a buffer resistor from the "tap" to the GATE - to limit power to the Gate.
  • A Buffer Resistor and Ferrite Bead to Isolate DC from mixing with RF unless it's at the gate.
When you're not sure of the install - as in your first time - the best success is obtained when you keep it simple.

The above is a guide and TEST YOUR WORK before you attach the power to the GATE - this way you can then see if the '520 - or whatever you use, will handle that Gate voltage and not overheat or burn out from the GATE tuning on with NO RF POWER PRESENT. IT (MOSFET) needs to be PROVEN to be OFF when you apply that small gate voltage.
  • A Sidebar: The 13N10FQP or IRF520 MOSFET's are not LINEAR devices, they are switches. The can work in these RF circuits because they can use the inductive and capacitive effects left behind by the Bipolar device you're replacing this with.
  • BUT this comes at a price, the STABILITY of the MOSFET is HIGHLY DEPENDENT on the values for all the parts involved. THE BJT (you're replacing) used PREVIOUS POWER LEVELS to obtain and amplify RF. The MOSFET going in to replace it - is a LOT different THEY ARE FAR MOREE SENSITIVE to power in both RF to Base now GATE from Collector/Emitter - now DRAIN to SOURCE
IF YOU DON"T follow the above advice remember MOSFET's - they turn on if there is enough GATE voltage and will act as a simple switch and pull any and all power across the leads to ground - burning it (your MOSFET) up and possibly damaging the radio in the process.
 
Well, we've kinda' been over this...

AM? Doing up a EN1230 for a Cobra 29?

AM AND SSB? Like a Galaxy?

Here's for AM...take it or leave it...but within the first Graphic is the CB Tricks values...369DR and 369FN

IF the '520 is in the FINAL position - then you need Diode 390 tied in series, with ANY value of Resistor being from 470 ohm onto as much as 3.9K across the Diode Resistor combo from Top to ground...

Like this...

And even then, this is arbitrary - because each "setup" is different...
View attachment 37092
What makes this a problem is how much power is present for swing the operator doing this mod, wants to do with the DRIVER and how much power swing it will have.

Ok, don't go overboard or overthink this...

If you want to install this little EN1230 equivalent - that's fine.

But it needs power to work properly. The above values are approximate ok?
  • there's a problem with the above design. It's set for a limited range of RF power.
They, those Resistor values - change if you have MORE than a 2 watt carrier driving an amp swinging to over 12 watts - works with 2 watts swing to 12 - AS shown.

But if you're running a 4 watts carrier to swing power into a High Drive linear - the above may be way too much in resistive values - reduce those R-Values to 390 (Diode side) and even 2.7K for 4-6 watts of carrier..
  • AGAIN - and I can't stress this enough...there's a problem with the above design. It's set for a limited range of RF power in which to sample and then rectify into a DC level signal the GATE of the '520 can use.
You may be safer to use a straight simple DC biasing scheme instead...
Do up a divider and work within it's resistor pair to generate a tap voltage of about 3.4 ~ 3.7 volts - using two resistors...an 8.2K / 7.5K and 4.7K or 5.2K (not a common values but it is produced) to give you the "preset" voltage the gate can see to just BARELY (READ READY TO) turn on and when RF shows up then it can turn on all the way and amplify.
UNIDEN 678 did something like it...
View attachment 37102
Also - as a measure of SAFETY - use a buffer resistor from the "tap" to the GATE - to limit power to the Gate.
  • A Buffer Resistor and Ferrite Bead to Isolate DC from mixing with RF unless it's at the gate.
When you're not sure of the install - as in your first time - the best success is obtained when you keep it simple.

The above is a guide and TEST YOUR WORK before you attach the power to the GATE - this way you can then see if the '520 - or whatever you use, will handle that Gate voltage and not overheat or burn out from the GATE tuning on with NO RF POWER PRESENT. IT (MOSFET) needs to be PROVEN to be OFF when you apply that small gate voltage.
  • A Sidebar: The 13N10FQP or IRF520 MOSFET's are not LINEAR devices, they are switches. The can work in these RF circuits because they can use the inductive and capacitive effects left behind by the Bipolar device you're replacing this with.
  • BUT this comes at a price, the STABILITY of the MOSFET is HIGHLY DEPENDENT on the values for all the parts involved. THE BJT (you're replacing) used PREVIOUS POWER LEVELS to obtain and amplify RF. The MOSFET going in to replace it - is a LOT different THEY ARE FAR MOREE SENSITIVE to power in both RF to Base now GATE from Collector/Emitter - now DRAIN to SOURCE
IF YOU DON"T follow the above advice remember MOSFET's - they turn on if there is enough GATE voltage and will act as a simple switch and pull any and all power across the leads to ground - burning it (your MOSFET) up and possibly damaging the radio in the process.
Thank you, I appreciate your knowledge and will play it safe. I did a mod and will be adding in a resistor to the gate just to be safe.
 
Thanks for stopping by to let us know...

Just as a caution - if you haven't already read enough about it...:)

I'm finding a lot of MOSFET conversion from the older 2078' Transistor to the Newer MOSFET - there are some "set ways" and some that aren't so "Set" ...

The above posts are meant as a Guide line for you, (I know) - but to each their own.

As to the "Why" of this follow up, I've have been repairing others' works. At least in replacing the final - they use specific types and I've seen just about everything.

The ones to caution you on, are...

The 13N10's and the IRF520 - they aren't the problem per-se, but it depends on what one is driving the other...

Some older Galaxy dual finals radios have use the IRF520 with no problems except they produce crappy amounts of backwards swing - a lot of that has to do with the EN parts used and their drive levels (as well as their more dedicated rework to interface their boards to the new line of thinking regarding BJT's to MOSFET from Current to Voltage). It's a little more complex than that, but the CRUX of the problem is the Bipolar (Predriver section) to MOSFET Final/Driver - so if you decide to go on your own - the "TX voltage feed Bias" method works ok, but it's trigger happy.

Keep your Gate voltages to around 3 to 4 volts per part
  • - try not to "Share" the same feeder resistor
  • - give each MOSFET their own power feed - don't tie it's Gate bias with The other.
  • Use a resistor divider from the power feed buss line - your' 8 Volt TX line, for EACH MOSFET.
  • Give each MOSFET their own source feed resistor
    • - 8.2K or 6.8K or even 7.5K from the 8V buss is fine
    • - just remember to use a means to take off voltage - so that means you'll need a bleed Down resistor from the Gate too.
  • Value of the resistor value of the Tap off from the divider? Well, a simple buffer resistor just to keep things from going catastrophic on you is fine - no big values - even 1K is a bit much but then anything above 100 ohms keeps RF to the part (MOSFET), not feeding back into your divider network - helps. Think of it as, What Happens In Vegas, Stays in Vegas...:whistle:
The EN parts like the 1230 or 369's are less problematic but then have LIMITED levels of power they can process. They can't handle a lot of swing from the Driver, for a purpose of using say a "swing mod" or you're redesigning the Final to drive a High drive amp to drive it with swing. EN's aren't made for that - they'll "pinch up" your audio and aren't the best as making MOSFET's work linearly - produced like what Swing Mods are. You'll find the power feeder resistor divider works better for this.

The 369 part designs, so you know, were designed for BIAS feeds, so they needed a voltage - albeit a trickle one. Read this as a voltage presence with hardly any power behind it for drive current.

The 1230 part was made for AM and FM Class C and Class D stuff, not really meant for SSB.

The EN DR-FN pair as well as the 1230 - were designed for PRESET levels of RF they can use; detect and process for Gate voltage - with limited swing range in power. Look at it this way, you can put a restrictor plate on a car, and hire a driver to drive in circles with it all day, but they are meant for specific levels of speed. It takes a little more effort to obtain maximum power - that delay as well as the conditions of the turns in the track - make the effort to maintain a set speed harder or more difficult to do than to use a vehicle with no restrictor plate to limit the "air flow" of the normally aspirated ones.

Translate RF CARRIER to speed - RF being sent to the the Gate is that "speed" - so AM carrier and FM are a type of envelope and emission to provide the Diode in these little dittys' a means to rectify and produce a DC voltage to apply to the Gate and keep it on for the time you transmit.

But they can't throttle back power if you use a lot of high levels of modulation - they simply keep rectifying the power present and applying more and more to the Gate.

The IRF520's in a typical Galaxy use 5.1Volt Zeners for this reason - to limit power delivery and "Clamp" if it's exceeded.

Which is what brings me to the 13N10's debacle...

Found several radios with the 13N10s' blown but checking their Bias setting, found them to be pretty close to normal - a little high - but necessary for the Audio not to sound pinched or scrunched up from not enough Bias drive voltage. Fine when you run FM or limited Modulation (READ: LIMITER INTACT AND SET TO 70% MOD)but their Bias can be set too high for swinging their drive levels - they'll trigger on, with RF present, BUT REFUSE TO TURN OFF until they blow up (Latched ON). This problem is why I suggest the "buffer" and Bleed down resistors - because once the MOSFET gets warm, it gets a little too sensitive in the Gate region and tends to want to turn on and stay on until it cools down.

EVEN WHEN GATE TX VOLTAGE IS REMOVED.

Can't stress that enough.

The 13N10's are really good, but are SLOWER, read this as a different type of response curve.

The 13N10's Rise and Fall times give you the "slope" of 27MHz's RF wave, so as they Rise (Crest) and Fall (trough) they look and appear wonderfully as a simple clean Sine wave. Don't worry, that is a good thing - it's lets people get comfortable with the idea that your part, and the Maximum Useable Frequency - are nearly identical.

Ok, with me so far?

The problem is with Drive levels - the preceding stages leading into the Gate of a 13N10 may contain parasitic spurries and harmonics - which are bandwidth problems. (Like Heavy Modulation) The 13N10 can't handle these very well and actually can fail based upon a frequency response problem of exceeding their ability to handle RF in the spectrums above their maximum useable Frequency.
  • Remember this: The useable frequency and the extra spurious frequencies and their drive levels produced - are rectified by the diodes' singular function in the EN devices to provide a DC Gate turn on. IT's can be quite higher in voltage than the Gate can properly use. It is why they use a resistor in series in line and as well as a paralleled Bleeder Resistor designed to take some of the charge away at a given rate of discharge.
  • So when you use Heavy Modulation; that drive level of audio is RECTIFIED along with the RF carrier present - so if you sum the two together, you can get quite a large amount of drive level - enough that it can exceed the Gates Input voltage and or Current - which is seen as capacitance - you can spike the Gate with more power and damage it.

Remember they are slow(er) than other MOSFET's. So think of these extra, higher frequencies as a "ringing effect" and looks like a Gate Capacitance problem - like it's seeing excessive Gate capacitance and so they "latch" and refuse to "Fall" and blow up in the process.

This is why I posted so many messages in this thread, I want you to have THE BEST success in getting this to work with far fewer failures than from what I've had. You're seeing all my notes and what I've learned from these so far.
 
I've used an LM317 connected to the switched TX 8v in my Cobra 29, a 220 ohm resistor and a 500 ohm pot as R1 and R2 which gives 1.25 volts - 4.00 volts through a 470uH inductor connected to the gate. I it set for 3.7v.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeapFrog
Andy,
Would you be able to show one of your drawings of how you would setup a cobra 29 with a 13n10? I get what your saying about the 13n10 possibly getting stuck on even when not in TX but seeing a visual would be very helpful. I'm just trying to understand the whole bleeder and buffer resistor setup.
Also would you make any changes to the driver circuit to allow for more drive?
Thanks for the informative postings.
 
Well, I'd love to, but I have to wait until the wife can go back to work.

Funny, we love each other, but I have to make sure she's' being taken care of, her PC's are ok, the Air Conditioner for her "office" is working and she's' comfortable - just can't really do any vids or any photo shoots until she clears out and we can get back to work again.
 
@Mk121 - for further study...even though this is for a Stryker 955...

What I have shown you is used in AM only radios - you may need to know the SSB side of this for your questions about Driver and Drive levels - for between the two - you will see the Resistor values and their changes for the various "Stages" they are used in.

upload_2020-5-29_11-47-36.png

For your Study....

upload_2020-5-29_18-46-4.png
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • @ Crawdad:
    One of the few times my tiny station gets heard on 6m!:D
  • @ Galanary:
    anyone out here familiar with the Icom IC-7300 mods
  • @ Crawdad:
    7300 very nice radio, what's to hack?
  • @ kopcicle:
    The mobile version of this site just pisses me off
  • @ unit_399:
    better to be pissed off than pissed on.