I own a shockwave now and it talks decent. I'm thinking about getting the vector 4000 just to see how well it hangs with the shockwave.
I have a vector 4000 and I like it a lot. I have never had a Shockwave so I am not able to compare. Here is a link to my install, check it out.
https://www.worldwidedx.com/threads/sirio-new-vector-4000-install.226677/
I had a guy 27 miles from me as the crow flies do the very same swap out and I saw no difference in his signal strength he went back to the Shockwave for the build quality and strength but both are very good antennas performance wise.
Thanks for the kind words Marconi, this is the first antenna at the house. I have a Starduster copy on the corner of the detached garage about 23 feet to the feed point. The 4k is about 40 ft to the feed point and with different radios at different locations it is hard to compare. As expected, the 4k set up does better with DX. Although I can shoot skip with the Starduster, I use it mostly for local coms when I am in the garage working on stuff. Sorry that doesn't answer your question.Shadetree, nice setup.
If you have had another antenna up and working well, are you able to make any comparisons about your experiences with the NV4K?
eddz, I'm not surprised at what you're reporting. Several other members here, that know a thing or two, will tell us you have to compare contacts out further, like 50 miles or more where you might see a real increase in performance.
Can you guys try further out?
With a typical 5/8 groundplane like the shockwave I can scan 160m thru 10m looking for activity. A friend with a vector 4000 style antenna cannot. It's def on lower frequencies.
Being able to adjust the pattern with the 4k on the DX horizon sounds interesting. But I am not sure how to tell if any adjustments actually helped with DX being so unpredictable.
It would be neat to talk to Europe on 27.555, is there a way to tell what location on the horizon would be able to skip a certain distance?