Easy to say when you are not the forum owner facing copyright infringement.
Fair use.
No need to worry about it.
U.S. Copyright Office - Fair Use
Easy to say when you are not the forum owner facing copyright infringement.
W8JI has posted an informative article on his site that is worth reading:
"QST The Care and Feeding of a 3-500ZG filament
Regretfully the October 2011 QST, on page 40, contains a fatally flawed filament voltage management article. Without question, the QST article gives life-threatening advice. The article specifically instructs readers to remove a protective cover and intentionally defeat a safety interlock by placing the reader's hand only inches from lethal voltages. The article further instructs readers to look away from their hand while high voltage is active.
There is never a reason to defeat a critical safety protection system and activate lethal voltages with protective covers removed. Anything determined with the cover removed can be more safely accomplished with the cover in place, or with power removed. This is true for all problems.
Besides safety, the article's instructions will almost certainly lead to improper equipment operation or tube life problems. Nearly all instructions in the QST article, as well as all technical information in that article, are wrong for any brand or type of amplifier."
Read more here
From my perspective it's good there is an ARRL.
.....I think they have to much to cover with the people they have and the money to work with.
.....It seems they are nearly totally involved in defending an amateur right to erect antennas and towers, saving the bands from commerical intrusion, losing parts or all of a band in the uhf region, going to the IAU to fight for more spectrum and still try to connect with the membership plus other things going on with the US FCC and states that keep trying to make rules that go against the amateur operations.
......I can see where the membership has a position of 'what do they do for me' on a more personal level.
......Our FCC amateur enforcement has been very poor for some 15 years and getting worse.
......The ARRL has no enforcement powers.
......Many people still blame the ARRL for the no code situation.
......It was not the ARRL but gov. pressure on the FCC to allow more people into the hobby.
......The FCC turned over the administration of Ham radio to the ARRL, so good there there but they have to do it as they are told to do.
*
......I hear the UK association is in trouble but not many details except I hear about power stuggle and corruption with the officials.
......Try to look at the bigger picture.
......If one does not stay in touch, you cannot see the picture at all.
If we had no representation all these years , where would we be now?
There is never a reason to defeat a critical safety protection system and activate lethal voltages with protective covers removed. Anything determined with the cover removed can be more safely accomplished with the cover in place, or with power removed. This is true for all problems.
"Dead" wrong! A play on words of course. However, it could definitely kill someone that has no experience but there are DEFINITELY times when it is tatally necessary for a professional engineer to defeat safty features in question. If he has never seen a time then he hasn't done much techwork with this type of device.
Not really.
When dealing with HV PS if troubleshooting everything can be done by other methods instead of applying power to the circuit.
I will agree pulling the cover off and putting it back on can be time consuming, and a pain depending on what you are working on. Example an amplifier that has a slide in case instead of a two piece cover. But any maintenance can be done without defeating a safety interlock if one wants to take the time to do it correctly.
Of course this would require having proper test equipment and associated parts required to perform the maintenance action.
I still disagree. I used to service broadcast gear. The transmitters would inhibit the HV as soon as any door or if the meter panel was open.The plate voltage meter was connected to the HV supply so that is why the meter panel had an interlock on it. One time I had a startup problem where the HV current overload relay would activate as soon as the HV was turned on. Obviously there was either a short or an arc somewhere. I needed to be able to see inside the various parts of the TX while at the same time turning on the HV to get a visual of where the arc was coming from. There were no faults with the HV off. Zero. Nadda. Nothing wrong at all. The problem ended up being a ceramic disc capacitor in the audio section that would remain open to DC in the off state but would arc to ground when HV was applied and only when HV was applied. The location of the capacitor made it impossible to see unless the front safety screen was removed. Oh yeah, it also only showed up with the lights off as the filaments from the four 833C's were creating too much light inside the TX cabinet. So with one hand on the light switch and the other on the PLATES ON button I was finally able to locate and resolve the problem.
Yes, there are times when defeating safety interlocks is the only way to get the job done. A megger would not provide enough current to arc and you would have no idea where to start looking with one anyway.
Waverider and I will continue to disagree on this matter but having been there on more than one occasion I can see the need. Not everything is as cut and dried as he would like to think. No disrespect meant by the waverider. It's just that my 29 years experience has shown me that and it has also shown me the way to properly and safely handle such situations so lets just agree to disagree on this. OK?
There is a reason to bypass the safety deadlocks?
Please do so whilst the OSHA inspector is standing in your shop and explain that to him/her.
We "had" a guy working on a battery charging rack system for forklifts. The tech 'bypassed" the safety and the entire rack, over 4000 lbs landed on him. This was a few days before Thanksgiving last year, not that the date matters, but you did see where I typed "had", he is no longer around to explain why he did bypass a safety.
OSHA spends A LOT of time at your facility when there is a fatality. They are not bad people, they have a job, and they do it well.
So, I agree, there is no SAFE reason to bypass a safety device. Convenience is not a reason.