biferi,
That's how to find the full wave length in meters, you're right. But a full wave length isn't that useful as an antenna length, sort of. A dipole, for instance, is a half wave length long. Another commonly used length is a 1/4 wave length (verticals).
And while the "300 / Mhz" figure is correct, it isn't exactly 'close' to a useful length for when wire is being used as a conductor (or metal tubing either). The reason for that is something called 'velocity factor', or the speed of an electron in a conductor as opposed to 'space'. The number that you come up with will be too large. Cutting it back to a shorter length by way of using some method to determining how well you are hearing things (fancy way of saying that using a meter to determine the 'best' length with the equations length as a starting point) is very common and considered normal, or the "tuning" of an antenna.
Not being familiar with metric measurements, or comfortable with them, I usually deal with feet and inches. The "magic" number for a 1/2 wave length in feet is 468 / Mhz. For a 1/4 wave it's 234 / Mhz. And for a full wave length (at the typical antenna heights I deal with) is 984 / Mhz. These figures are also 'ball-park' numbers, typically a bit too long, not exact by any means. For listening or only receiving, they will certainly work just fine. If you do the converting between meters and feet I think you will find that the results are pretty close (close enough anyway).
- 'Doc
(Always a bunch of "if's", "ands", and "but's" in this stuff, isn't there??)