What makes the Bird 43 the go-to wattmeter.?? Why is it so much better than anything else out there ?? For years, I have relied on 2 watt meters: A DRAKE W-4 and a TRANSEL Mark II A. The Drake belonged to my father and it's old as dirt. I bought the Transel in '76 ,or so, because it was of the few (if not the only) peak reading wattmeters out there back then. Both of them have served me well over the years. What can a Bird do that these can't ?? Remember, we're talking CBs here.
Personally, I think the wattmeter output of a cb radio is a relative thing and it really doesn't mean much. It either works or it doesn't. I suppose it's good for bragging rights to the uninitiated, but not much else. I really don't understand the need to choke every last milliwatt out of a transmitter. Like it will make any difference on the receive end ?? IT WON'T. Actually the money spent on an expensive wattmeter is better spent on a decent 'scope with an RF pickup. This way you can SEE the output and tune it for the best waveform without harmonics or spurs. If you must have more power ... run a linear.
Still I would like someone to tell me what makes the Bird 43 the Holy Grail.
- 399
Personally, I think the wattmeter output of a cb radio is a relative thing and it really doesn't mean much. It either works or it doesn't. I suppose it's good for bragging rights to the uninitiated, but not much else. I really don't understand the need to choke every last milliwatt out of a transmitter. Like it will make any difference on the receive end ?? IT WON'T. Actually the money spent on an expensive wattmeter is better spent on a decent 'scope with an RF pickup. This way you can SEE the output and tune it for the best waveform without harmonics or spurs. If you must have more power ... run a linear.
Still I would like someone to tell me what makes the Bird 43 the Holy Grail.
- 399
Last edited: