• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

Reach out & touch someone... if DHS will LET you!

The War Wagon

Active Member
Dec 27, 2014
139
34
38
da' 'BURGH
FOOD for thought, for the "cellular addicted."

Homeland Security Conceals “Secret Plan to Cut Cell Service” During Emergencies

The Supreme Court is setting aside a petition from the Electronic Privacy Information Center that demanded the Department of Homeland Security release the US government’s secret plan to shutter mobile phone service during disasters.

… ruling that the DHS did not have to divulge the full contents of Standard Operating Procedure 303. That court held that… disclosure would “endanger” public safety.

Under the direction of the so-called National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee, SOP 303 allows for the shutting down of wireless networks “within a localized area, such as a tunnel or bridge, and within an entire metropolitan area.” … Local governments, however, have the power to shutter wireless service regardless of SOP 303.

Like all great emergency powers, this high tech control plan has already been abused. Homeland Security used the kill switch to shut off service to cell phones in order to stifle a San Francisco protest:

The privacy group had demanded the document in 2011 following the shuttering of cell service in the San Francisco Bay Area subway system to quell a protest.

… a “unified voluntary process for the orderly shut-down and restoration of wireless services during critical emergencies such as the threat of radio-activated improvised explosive devices.” (Here is a copy of a heavily redacted version (PDF) of the protocol that EPIC’s lawsuit produced.)

Keep those Hams & CB's warm, just in case the alphabet agencies suddenly decide you DON'T need cell service... (n)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 222DBFL

Cutting cell service during an emergency doesn't seem like a smart thing to do. What would someone's option be to call for assistance or pass along important information about the emergency in progress?

This kind of thing feeds more into conspiracy theory than disaster preparedness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 222DBFL
In all the experiences I have had with emergeny response is that having communications is about 2nd on the list of top priorities!! I did all Cingular Hurricane response stuff back when Katrina, we had military escort to some places!! So I know it's not an issue of not being important. JMHO.
 
If I'm trapped in a burning building it is...if I'm handling looters trying break into my home it's secondary to making sure the 30rd mag in my AR is full :)
 
Cutting cell service during an emergency doesn't seem like a smart thing to do. What would someone's option be to call for assistance or pass along important information about the emergency in progress?

This kind of thing feeds more into conspiracy theory than disaster preparedness.

Cell service is technically able to be suspended while maintaining the ability to place calls to 911 but only 911 or any other preauthorized number. It is also technically able to disallow cell phones from accessing the cellular network unless they have "special authorization" thru embedded software that recognizes them as being allowed to access the network based on priority while others are not. This has been possible for many years and is a way of maintaining the network for official emergency users while not overloading it by the general public. IOW government and emergency officials and workers can maintain cellular service while others are blocked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RatsoW8
Makes sense bu
Cell service is technically able to be suspended while maintaining the ability to place calls to 911 but only 911 or any other preauthorized number. It is also technically able to disallow cell phones from accessing the cellular network unless they have "special authorization" thru embedded software that recognizes them as being allowed to access the network based on priority while others are not. This has been possible for many years and is a way of maintaining the network for official emergency users while not overloading it by the general public. IOW government and emergency officials and workers can maintain cellular service while others are blocked.

This makes sense. Must have been implemented after the 9/11 attack. I recall one of the big issues was the overloading of the cellular networks making it impossible to make a call. People were looking for twisted pair phones to contact loved ones.
 
Just on a side note, I am not sure about in the USA but here in Canada it is law that even a deactivated cell phone such as one you no longer use and had service switched off to, MUST by law be able to place calls to 911. It does not have to be able to receive any calls but MUST be able to place calls to 911.
 
Cell service is technically able to be suspended while maintaining the ability to place calls to 911 but only 911 or any other preauthorized number. It is also technically able to disallow cell phones from accessing the cellular network unless they have "special authorization" thru embedded software that recognizes them as being allowed to access the network based on priority while others are not. This has been possible for many years and is a way of maintaining the network for official emergency users while not overloading it by the general public. IOW government and emergency officials and workers can maintain cellular service while others are blocked.

Our district has had that ability for many years.
 
Our district has had that ability for many years.


I figured that would be the case most everywhere. I believe this new way of denying cellular access is a little different however as IIRC there was something in the news a couple years ago about the government requiring cell phones be manufactured with the ability to be shut down on command. Not sure it that actually inhibits the TX in them or not. This would be different from the current (or older) way of simply denying access to the system.
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • @ Mark Malcomb:
    Hello BJ. Been a long time since I've been on. You doing well? Mark Malcomb
  • @ Naysayer:
    I’m
  • @ kingmudduck:
    Hello to all I have a cobra 138xlr, Looking for the number display for it. try a 4233 and it did not work