• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

Another hammer gets popped

C2

Sr. Member
Aug 3, 2005
2,408
82
158
Name: gerritson's guilty
Comments: Gerritsen Convicted on All Counts in Radio Jamming Case
NEWINGTON, CT, Dec 9, 2005--A US District Court jury has found Jack Gerritsen of Bell, California, guilty on six counts that included transmitting without a license and willful and malicious interference with radio transmissions. Gerritsen, 69, who briefly held the amateur call sign KG6IRO, will face sentencing March 6, according to the office of Debra W. Yang, US Attorney for the Central District of California. He could receive up to 15 years in federal prison.

"The Federal Communication Commission investigated illegal radio transmissions linked to Gerritsen for four years," said a statement from Yang's office after the verdict. "According to court documents filed in this case, the FCC investigation revealed that Gerritsen transmitted his prerecorded messages, as well as real-time harassment and profanity, for hours at a time, often making it impossible for licensed radio operators to use the public frequencies." A federal grand jury indicted Gerritsen last spring.

Gerritsen had earlier turned down the offer of a public defender and served as his own attorney in the federal court trial. The government's case, presented by Assistant US Attorney Lamar Baker, went to the jury December 8, and the jury deliberated for less than an hour before returning its verdict today. US District Court Judge R. Gary Klausner revoked Gerritsen's bail, and the defendant was taken into custody following the verdict.

Gerritsen was found guilty of interfering with a Military Affiliate Radio System (MARS) communication last March and interfering with American Red Cross communications last January--both misdemeanors--and of interfering with US Coast Guard communications in October 2004, a felony.

Those familiar with the court proceedings, which got under way December 6, said Gerritsen tended to focus on freedom of speech issues and sometimes confused those giving testimony. Among those testifying at length on behalf of the government was FCC Senior Agent Steven Pierce, who discussed his use of mobile direction-finding equipment and techniques used in tracking the source of the illegal and interfering transmissions.

Just days before the trial began, the FCC affirmed a total of $42,000 in additional fines it had levied on Gerritsen, releasing two $21,000 Forfeiture Orders (NOFs). In affirming the fines, the FCC rebuffed every argument Gerritsen had offered in responding to each Notice of Apparent Liability (NAL), including his insistent "freedom of speech" claim.

"His unlicensed operation on amateur frequencies is not protected by the US Constitution as it is well established that the right to free speech does not include the right to use radio facilities without a license," the FCC said in a footnote in one of the NOFs. The federal court jury in California apparently agreed.

In late November, Klausner denied Gerritsen's motion to dismiss the three counts of transmitting without a license, turning away Gerritsen's argument that the FCC could not set aside his Amateur Radio license without a hearing. Klausner declared that the effect of the FCC's 2001 set aside of KG6IRO "was to treat the application as if it had never been granted." Since Gerritsen never held an Amateur Radio license, he never had the right to a hearing, the judge reasoned.

One of the recent $21,000 NOFs involved alleged willful and repeated malicious interference with Amateur Radio communications. The second focused on allegations of willful and repeated interference with the radio communications of a US Coast Guard Auxiliary officer attempting to use Amateur Radio frequencies to assist a sailboat in distress. Last March, the FCC upheld a $10,000 fine against Gerritsen for interfering with Amateur Radio communications. The government has yet to collect.

FBI agents, accompanied by FCC staff, arrested Gerritsen without incident last May and seized his radio equipment. Released on $250,000 bond while awaiting trial, Gerritsen remained in home detention, barred from possessing any radio equipment.

Gerritsen's history of radio-related legal problems go back to 2000 when he was convicted for intercepting, obstructing and/or interfering with California Highway Patrol radio communications. In November 2001, the FCC's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau issued, then quickly rescinded, Gerritsen's Technician license, KG6IRO, because of his earlier conviction. While transmitting on various Los Angeles-area repeaters, Gerritsen continued to identify as KG6IRO, however.

Radio amateurs on the West Coast complained for months about the slow pace of enforcement action in the Gerritsen case. Los Angeles-area repeater owners had taken to shutting down their machines to avoid the nearly constant barrage of malicious interference and lengthy political tirades attributed to Gerritsen
Saturday, December 10th 2005 - 06:52:59 PM

The arrest:
jacksarrest002.jpg


The new diggs:
jack.jpg


:p
 

Hee! Hee! Been going on for 2 years! LOL! :D He was a thorn in the side to police, fire, and military comms for years. He was NOT a "ham"--he just THOT he was!! LOL! He got convicted of interfering with police comms and THEN applied for the license. FCC found out and pulled the ticket. The man, in effect, said, "They can't do that".

Oh YESSS they CAN! Now he will likely pull time. Likely he will see those "digs"!



73

CWM
 
There is no reference to CB, but he DID interfere with police comms (a BIG no-no) before applying for the ham license. Then
FCC discovered his conviction and revoked it. The guy would have none of that and continued to operate on the local repeaters despite warnings from hams and FCC as well. He would transmit long (broadcast), rambling tirades of one sort or another. He interfered with the Coast Guard trying to contact a
ship in distress, asserting that the Coast Guard's transmissions were not emergency traffic (DUH! It is if CG SAYS it is!!!) It's a wonder that somebody out there didn't pay that old buzzard a little "visit" and an attitude adjustment! :shock: :p

CWM
 
[/quote]

That raises a good question if a guy such as this was a full time CB operator who got a ham license a few years back and thought it would be cool to have but never used it. And is caught by the FCC will people still refer to him as a ham?[/quote]

If the license is fully issued, and there were no problems from the individual, no one would care it it were never used,. In THIS case, however, the FCC set the license aside as soon as they realized the mistake.

I'm sure there are many hams in the FCC's database who are not active but still have valid licenses. If the license is valid, the individual's a ham in my judgement.
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • @ Mark Malcomb:
    Hello BJ. Been a long time since I've been on. You doing well? Mark Malcomb
  • @ Naysayer:
    I’m
  • @ kingmudduck:
    Hello to all I have a cobra 138xlr, Looking for the number display for it. try a 4233 and it did not work