If I’m going to buy a vehicle, I pay cash. The last vehicle was in 2007. A 2004 Dodge Ram 2500 2WD Quadcab. Man trans & 8’ bed. The 305HP/555TQ model. One previous (commercial) owner. Best vehicle I’ve ever owned as to reliability and component life. (All original except one brake re-line and u-joints. Two sets of tires in 225k).
Had it (12) years now. Can’t see a good reason to change. (21-mpg average all miles; 15 average pulling my 35’ travel trailer).
The 3rd Brake light type mount wouldn’t interest me. BREEDLOVE, or nothing.
1). Whatever truck you own, it won’t ever have the next-to-nothing depreciation my model has seen. ($3000 down in 12-years from what I paid before trade-in).
2). Nor will your truck feature buyers who fly across the continent to get it.
3). Those others like mine remaining have been thru the hands of kids who abused them. Operators who wore them out twice already. Etc.
4). Go count the holes already in your vehicle. Doors are a hole. Doorhandles. All the glass. Etc. Dozens of them.
5). EMT & LEO plus corporate have had 2-way equipment since before any of us were born. The IMTS Motorola phones my father had starting in 1962 always required a hole cut for an antenna. Buick’s and Cadillacs.
A). None leak.
B)) Re-sale isn’t affected.
C). Note the deceptive use of the word “damaging” in the items description. (That’s a lie, as it is in no way, “damage”).
6). If the long-term residual & collector value of my pickup is (will be) greater than what one can buy recently — and the
improvements by the owner that are equal to or better than factory (where abuse isn’t indicated; gooseneck hitch; 4WD lift kit,etc) — why should you hesitate to do it correctly?
Would I cut an antenna hole in a rare collector car? Why wouldn’t I? It’s one hole among many.
The brake light mount is a handy-looking (expensive) item. But if it doesn’t maximize performance, it’s a mistake, IMO.
It also isn’t the difficult part of an installation. (That’s your focus)
www.k0bg.com
.