thats great booty i would eat that all day long and i not talking about the popcorn!"i bet that and the imax would perform pretty close to that overpriced 20 lb i10k sinker."
thats great booty i would eat that all day long and i not talking about the popcorn!"i bet that and the imax would perform pretty close to that overpriced 20 lb i10k sinker."
in my conditions booty the imax out performed the maco v 5/8 by 1 s unit but whatever.i have owned the m400 the antron with gpk and the maco v 5/8 and the imax.and the imax out performed them all so i dont know i thought you were an imax believer but maybe i was wrong.maco v58 and workman w 58 , depending on your weather theres a few by sirio for similar or less money too .
True but then there are those that say nothing and sit back and learn by listening. My signature is aimed at all those who have others convinced they know everything while those of us that know better can pick them out as soon as the bullshit starts flying. IOW those that subscribe to the theory that if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. :laugh:
#1 Would the exposed copper feed wire benefit from a coating of Noalox or maybe a covering of liquid rubber brushed on?
No benefit to 'Noalox', that copper wire isn't aluminum. If you want to insulate it, do so. just make sure that liquid tape can take some voltage.
----------
#2 Is the mast being used electrically as a functioning part of the antenna or would the antenna benefit from being isolated from the mast?
Not really, either question.
-------------
#3 What is the best way to ground this antenna? I have a run of #10 twisted wire and an 8’ grounding rod but where would the best place be to attach the ground? To the actual antenna base, the mast, or the roof tripod that it will be mounted on? I will have a IS-50UX-C0 PolyPhaser in line (coax) just before it enters the shack.
If that mast you mount the thing on is metal, why not use it instead of wire to that inadequate ground rod? You'd save some wire, which you could then bury as additional grounding where it would do you a lot more good.
Concerning that 'PolyPhaser', read their information on that site. It should tell you a lot of things. The installation instructions would be nice to go by too.
- 'Doc
Flatside I don't know if it makes a difference, but my manual says the ends of the tuning ring should be 1" apart, unlike the 2" that 888 says.
in my conditions booty the imax out performed the maco v 5/8 by 1 s unit but whatever.i have owned the m400 the antron with gpk and the maco v 5/8 and the imax.and the imax out performed them all so i dont know i thought you were an imax believer but maybe i was wrong.
i am afraid i have to disagree and i am not sure how you came to that conclusion?i did by swapping antennas and testing to locations 50-70 miles away the maco is 19 1/2 feet long on cb band my imax with 102 in whip is 24 1/2 feet that is 5 feet difference and i dont see how all ground planes 5/8 would be bunched together seeing how all different ground planes have different lengths.that extra 5 feet alone is added height and capture area i dont think that response was well thought out. my 2 cents.The Imax will beat the A99 and the M400 however, it will not outperform the Maco V58 or any other 5/8 wave designed to work with a set of four 8 foot radials. The Imax was designed to work without radials and will not benefit from adding the radial kit the same way a normal 5/8 wave will. RFI is also reduced with the V58 style antenna compared to the Imax. The ONLY omni directional antenna you can buy that can beat this design of 5/8 wave is the Vector 4000. This comes with the tradeoff of poor mechanical strength.