-
You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
Bad,fowl, vulgar Language on the CB
- Thread starter okiebob
- Start date
Top Three Truck Driver Misconceptions About Base Station Operators:
1. They are all unemployed.
2. They all live in their parents' basements.
3. They are all the same guy.
LC
1. They are all unemployed.
2. They all live in their parents' basements.
3. They are all the same guy.
LC
Chinese people torture food animals because they think it makes the meat taste better. Imagine having every bone in your body broken, then dump you in pot of scalding hot water....then skin you alive. Any race of people that does that will eventually overcrowd Hell.
No I am not referring to animal fetuses. Business as usual in Asia.
foul language on the radio is just an extension of its growing acceptance in reality (you know that place where no-one uses radios to talk to/abuse each other)
the media is full of it now, and like little lambs people follow just about everything the media bullshit machine feeds them.
if your so concerned about people swearing on the radio there is many ways around it, change frequency, rf gain them into infinity,squelch the tards or if the worst comes to the worst and these mathods fail,there is generally a control marked volume (Af gain on fancy ham rigs,lol) which if you turn it fully anti clockwise till it clicks you can be just about certain you won't hear any more foul language. the other alternative is to get a life and go with the flow,baaa baaaa.
the media is full of it now, and like little lambs people follow just about everything the media bullshit machine feeds them.
if your so concerned about people swearing on the radio there is many ways around it, change frequency, rf gain them into infinity,squelch the tards or if the worst comes to the worst and these mathods fail,there is generally a control marked volume (Af gain on fancy ham rigs,lol) which if you turn it fully anti clockwise till it clicks you can be just about certain you won't hear any more foul language. the other alternative is to get a life and go with the flow,baaa baaaa.
Where do you people get the idea that anyone is SO OFFENDED? The OP doesn't seem to be all that upset. I'm not all that upset. I don't like it. There is no need for it. It sounds immature and weak minded but I don't loose any sleep over it. If someone wants to show how ignorant they are by swearing...go for it. Just a bunch of little people.
Terry
Terry
Not to stir up anything, but since we're on the subject, I found this one:
*****************************************************************
1
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
ENFORCEMENT BUREAU
San Francisco Field Office
5653 Stoneridge Dr., Suite 105
Pleasanton, California 94588-8543
December 2, 2010
Victor M. Coucelos
Anderson, California 96007
NOTICE OF UNLICENSED OPERATION
Case Number: EB-09-SF-0116
Document Number: W201132960001
The San Francisco Field Office of the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal
Communications Commission ("FCC") received a complaint of Citizens Band
("CB") Radio interference in the city of Anderson, California. On August
24, 2010, agents from this office confirmed by direction finding
techniques that radio signals on frequency 27.085 MHz were emanating from
your residence in Anderson, California. Agents also heard your station
transmitting sound effects, language that might be classified as profane,
indecent or obscene, and music. On August 25, 2010, the San Francisco
agents also observed your station operating on 27.085 MHz and confirmed by
radio direction finding techniques that the operation was originating from
your residence in Anderson, CA.
During an inspection of your CB station on August 25, 2010, you were
identified as the person responsible for its operation, and the inspection
revealed that a Galaxy, model DX 2517, transceiver was in use at your base
station, and a model Magnum S-9 Nitro transceiver was installed in your
vehicle. These transmitters are not certificated for CB use. The
transmitter output power was measured as 6 watts on the Galaxy DX 2517 and
6.2 watts on the Magnum S-9 Nitro. Your operation of these transmitters
voided your authority to operate your CB station.
During the inspection, the San Francisco agents issued you a verbal
warning. Any further operation with these transmitters might subject you
to more serious sanctions for engaging in violations of one or more of the
following FCC Rules:
1. Section 95.409 (CB Rule 9) - You must use an FCC certificated CB
transmitter at your CB station. Use of a transmitter which is not FCC
certificated voids your authority to operate the station
2. Section 95.410 (CB Rule 10) - Your CB station transmitter power output
must not exceed the following values under any conditions: AM (A3) - 4
watts (carrier power) SSB - 12 watts (peak envelope power). Use of a
transmitter which has carrier or peak envelope power in excess of that
authorized voids your authority to operate the station.
3. Section 95.413 (CB Rule 13) - You must not use a CB station to
transmit obscene, indecent or profane words, language or meaning; to
transmit music, whistling, sound effects or any material to amuse or
entertain; to transmit any sound effect solely to attract attention.
You must cease such violations immediately. If you do not do so, you may
be re-investigated during FCC enforcement efforts. If such an
investigation indicates that you have violated any FCC Rules you could
face severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary
forfeitures, in rem arrest action against the offending radio equipment,
and criminal sanctions including imprisonment. See Sections 401, 501, 503,
and 510 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
You have 15 days from the date of this letter and pursuant to Section
308(b) of the Act, you must respond to this letter advising what
corrective actions you have taken to eliminate the observed violations of
the Commission's Rules. Include the case number EB-09-SF-0116 in your
written response.
Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, the staff will use all relevant and
material information before it, including the information disclosed in
your reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to
ensure current and future compliance with FCC Regulations.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Thomas N. VanStavern
District Director
San Francisco Office
Western Region
Enforcement Bureau
Attachments:
Excerpts From The Communications Act of 1934, As Amended
See 47 C.F.R S:S: 95.409, 95.410, and 95.413.
47 U.S.C. S:S: 401, 501, 503, and 510.
P.L. 93-579, 12/31/74, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3).
*****************************************************************
1
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
ENFORCEMENT BUREAU
San Francisco Field Office
5653 Stoneridge Dr., Suite 105
Pleasanton, California 94588-8543
December 2, 2010
Victor M. Coucelos
Anderson, California 96007
NOTICE OF UNLICENSED OPERATION
Case Number: EB-09-SF-0116
Document Number: W201132960001
The San Francisco Field Office of the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal
Communications Commission ("FCC") received a complaint of Citizens Band
("CB") Radio interference in the city of Anderson, California. On August
24, 2010, agents from this office confirmed by direction finding
techniques that radio signals on frequency 27.085 MHz were emanating from
your residence in Anderson, California. Agents also heard your station
transmitting sound effects, language that might be classified as profane,
indecent or obscene, and music. On August 25, 2010, the San Francisco
agents also observed your station operating on 27.085 MHz and confirmed by
radio direction finding techniques that the operation was originating from
your residence in Anderson, CA.
During an inspection of your CB station on August 25, 2010, you were
identified as the person responsible for its operation, and the inspection
revealed that a Galaxy, model DX 2517, transceiver was in use at your base
station, and a model Magnum S-9 Nitro transceiver was installed in your
vehicle. These transmitters are not certificated for CB use. The
transmitter output power was measured as 6 watts on the Galaxy DX 2517 and
6.2 watts on the Magnum S-9 Nitro. Your operation of these transmitters
voided your authority to operate your CB station.
During the inspection, the San Francisco agents issued you a verbal
warning. Any further operation with these transmitters might subject you
to more serious sanctions for engaging in violations of one or more of the
following FCC Rules:
1. Section 95.409 (CB Rule 9) - You must use an FCC certificated CB
transmitter at your CB station. Use of a transmitter which is not FCC
certificated voids your authority to operate the station
2. Section 95.410 (CB Rule 10) - Your CB station transmitter power output
must not exceed the following values under any conditions: AM (A3) - 4
watts (carrier power) SSB - 12 watts (peak envelope power). Use of a
transmitter which has carrier or peak envelope power in excess of that
authorized voids your authority to operate the station.
3. Section 95.413 (CB Rule 13) - You must not use a CB station to
transmit obscene, indecent or profane words, language or meaning; to
transmit music, whistling, sound effects or any material to amuse or
entertain; to transmit any sound effect solely to attract attention.
You must cease such violations immediately. If you do not do so, you may
be re-investigated during FCC enforcement efforts. If such an
investigation indicates that you have violated any FCC Rules you could
face severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary
forfeitures, in rem arrest action against the offending radio equipment,
and criminal sanctions including imprisonment. See Sections 401, 501, 503,
and 510 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
You have 15 days from the date of this letter and pursuant to Section
308(b) of the Act, you must respond to this letter advising what
corrective actions you have taken to eliminate the observed violations of
the Commission's Rules. Include the case number EB-09-SF-0116 in your
written response.
Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, the staff will use all relevant and
material information before it, including the information disclosed in
your reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to
ensure current and future compliance with FCC Regulations.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Thomas N. VanStavern
District Director
San Francisco Office
Western Region
Enforcement Bureau
Attachments:
Excerpts From The Communications Act of 1934, As Amended
See 47 C.F.R S:S: 95.409, 95.410, and 95.413.
47 U.S.C. S:S: 401, 501, 503, and 510.
P.L. 93-579, 12/31/74, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3).
i was going to quote you cw morse but that is a sad use of my cpu resources, you really have to get a life mate.
did cb'ers rob your house, shit on your flower garden or rape your daughter or something? cause if not you have some serious issues mate.
i notice your location says retired, i can't help thinking the only place you've retired from is reality.
did cb'ers rob your house, shit on your flower garden or rape your daughter or something? cause if not you have some serious issues mate.
i notice your location says retired, i can't help thinking the only place you've retired from is reality.
If Jerry (CW morse) really cared about the ham bands he would spend time on 75m and report violators there instead on worrying about the CB'ers. I hear crap on 75m EVERY day while almost NEVER hearing any CB'ers on the air around here.