If been following the tread along ofcourse, and wanted to give a thought aswell..
First take a look at some center fed antennas:
Antennes - Slappe Arnold
Bobs idea...
The sleeve antenna
or ordinary broadcast dipoles..
And have you taken a look at your mobile antenna ??
Etc.
Oke, here goes the point i would like to make:
Is that no one of the above is know for its 0 Angle Take off angle.
Take off angle has got everything to do with heigth above ground/ground conductivity/polarisation/antenna.
Although i must mention the normal 1/4 wave ground plane is underappriciated in respect to TOA.
So the guys referening to the 0 degree Take off angle, Yes for sure in a test enviroment i can get many antennas with a 0 degree TOA.
But that will never happen in real life. It is strange that you see plots where ones is in freespace and the other antenna is not to my believe. Perhaps someone could explain.
What also is intresting, for the guys using Eznec/MMANA/4NEC2 etc..do yourself a favour and construct a vertical dipole then shift with the sources from down to halveway.
And take a look at what TOA does.
Lol, already i feel the claims comming on about not know what eznec will or will not do...but those claims can be made from any field testing aswell.
Todays eznec is quite close to feko (that software costs a bit more than those studios).
Not that a price proves anything...but where do we stop...
As is with everything combined is strongest, guess thats in this case aswell.
Now, dont get me wrong im not a anti-guy, i honestly believe it is a great antenna...simply cause the "dont need ground" thing.
But keeping in mind that a sufficient ground system needs less radials when it is elevated.
Grrr..see where im going at again..
Regards,
Henry
11 meter Dx antenna systemx