so thats from a sig eng 2 el? i looked at there 4 el when i decided to try it without the ground wire and just use a L bracket from the so239 to the boom
im starting my home built gainmaster this week. making it all with 213 which is good for 5kv. i have this problem, i look at a design and say 'i bet thats an important exact detail' then i build it ballpark close and it usually works just as good if not a little better. im going to build this to put 1000 am swinging to 1600 throiugh it to see if i can burn it or if it will handle it. i dont see why i cant just replace the 1.9kv rg303 with 213 on the oem gainmaster since 213 handles 5kv and the capacitance is within 95% of the 303 so ill just cut the 213 4.5% shorter. its the choke coil that is going to be the real chalenge
Nope NB, the image I posted earlier is not the 2 element Superhawk model. That model uses two wires in parallel for each polarity, because the boom is too short. See attached. The ground side of the 2 element antenna uses one of the wires for the ground side of the circuit and is floating with open ends.
What you saw in the post I made earlier uses only 1 wire for each polarity. Feed point B is for vertical and A is for horizontal in all SE quad models, which is the opposite of the typical current fed Quad antenna.
The shield and center conductors for each feed line are made into a short pig tails. Center conductor is attached along the brass stub wires and the shield wire is attached close by on the adjacent boom. This setup provides for proper tuning point using small hose clamps. So, the brass stub wires provide the tuning range necessary and support the center side of the feed line connection.
The feeder wires are also bent outward near the driven element and this bending provides for some impedance transformation nearer to 50 ohms back at the coax connection. IMO, the overall lengths of these feeders are a bit inductive (long) and with this bend in the feeder wires...a suitable match is attainable.
Good luck on the GM idea using 213. If that choke doesn't work perfectly, I don't think the antenna will provide anywhere near similar results. The size alone will be a problem for resonance, and you won't be able to wind that coax even close to what the GM is using. I don't believe you will be able to count on a loose tolerance design to sneak by on this one. For me, the GM design is pure genius, but with that said, I don't believe it's good enough of an advantage to try and remake it, to where it'll
shut down channel 6 or bend your needle.
View attachment SE Superhawk.pdf