It reminded me of a saying I heard. Some folks slurp their soup louder than others. Doesn't mean that the soups good .
I never heard that one before. I like it!
It reminded me of a saying I heard. Some folks slurp their soup louder than others. Doesn't mean that the soups good .
this DEMAND is also addressed to the owner(s), manager(s), operator(s), ‘directing’ mind(s) and/or ISP of this website, jointly and severally.
The owner of this site resides in the U.S. and is subject to U.S. laws, not Canada's. Better brush up on the U.S. laws before making "demands". A posting on a public internet discussion forum does not constitute a legal demand for anything. So when we don't do what you "demand", you'll have to get a court order from a Federal Court in the County of Los Angeles, since that's where the owner resides. And since you're a Canadian, you can't practice law or even represent yourself in the U.S. (you have NO rights here) so you'll need to hire an attorney that has been admitted to the State Bar of California.
Oh one last thing, California courts generally are consdiered to be the ones that are the MOST LIBERAL in their interpretations of the 1st Ammendment of the U.S. Constitution in terms of ruling for individual free speech.
Good luck, you're gonna need it...
OK I have been researching this 275 information only because I am curious, who is this other person I always see in the mix?
K3VR
All I see is stuff that he boasts to be "connected" to the FCC?
I did a google of K3VR and found all kinds of "oddball" stuff.
I just sent an email to the FCC and inquired about K3VR and asked if this is a legitimate contact for the FCC. No response yet but it has only been an hour since I sent the email.
Seems to me just this is just another soul wanting to try and make themselves known, any way they can, good or bad.
That is all we need, another piece of drama on the air!
I think you also failed to mention to Karol that under Section 512 of the Communication Act that ISP and web host are NOT liable for what is posted on their website by third parties. The reason for Section 512 was to protect people's free speech over the internet.
K3VR claims to help the FCC against people like Karol, as well as busting pirates which he brags about on his homepage. Recently K3VR on QRZ.COM claimed that he basically had the FCC permission to maliciously interfere with VE7KFM. Which raises the question, who else are amateurs allowed to interfere with because of their on-air behavior or speech? Does the FCC have list of amateur radio stations that amateurs are allowed to interfere with because of their speech, or behavior. And if so where is this list. K3VR is making this claim that he and his friends are trying to justify what they are doing (interfering) claiming that they have the FCC permission. In my book two wrong don't make a right.
Todd N9OGL
I Have Listened No Time For Someone Like This He Play's Hitlers Speeches Over The Air No Thanks I'LL PASS I Have Got A Life Too Lead , He is Of POOR Character ! Flawed From The WOMB!
I Have Listened No Time For Someone Like This He Play's Hitlers Speeches Over The Air No Thanks I'LL PASS I Have Got A Life Too Lead , He is Of POOR Character ! Flawed From The WOMB!