• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

Anytone at-5555n II (version 2)

I have not had the issues with my NII that Dallas is describing. Of course mine has only been run mobile in a big truck, which has myriad noise issues that have to be dealt with! I find the receive very nice to listen to and adjust. The NR is great, just as good, if not a shade better than my WM ClrSpkr! Just recently I took the NII out and put the TG Quad 5 in the truck. I always liked the Quad 5, but the receive (with the ClrSpkr) was not as nice as the NII!
Unfortunately, IMHO, Dallas may have received a defective NII. Also, IMHO, this is one of the drawbacks of the Anytone line. Limited consumer support is probably what you give up for the price point of their products.
Dallas, I hope you are able to have a good solution! I, and many others, are very happy with these radios!


JD

PS-My NII ser. #-1760220660018
 
I'm pretty much right on the cusp of sending this radio back. I love most things about the radio, but the number one thing I wanted was a nice sensitive and quiet receive.

Is there anyone else that has this issue?

In a nutshell:

A 5555N2 that NEVER shows less than a 4 S-unit indication on your meter? Even when you know the band is totally quiet, with no noise floor, as tested against the receive of another radio?

It's not as if I expect "perfect". But this is very annoying. It's the only radio I have (and have ever had) that shows a 4-5 level S-meter reading ALL (emphasis on the word "ALL") the time. When I know that there is NO noise floor on the band, according to my other radio(s).

And during the day, when there really IS a legitimate noise floor of just 1 S-unit, this thing shows a 6 or 7.

The reason I want to know if there are others with the same experience, is because this is what determines whether I send it back, or just live with it.

If I send it back, it's going to cost me money. And that's OK... IF... I'm pretty sure I won't end up with another radio that does the very same thing.

If there are other people that have a 5555 that does the very same thing, then I'll likely just accept that's just the way it is, keep it, and sock it away for emergencies.

A couple people have weighed in. One with a similar situation as mine, and one who's radio works the way it is supposed to. Anyone else?

I agree with your observations on Q5N2 S meter, Noise floor, NR, etc. Color me NOT impressed with the receiver on this radio. I even tried a 955 v2 this week thinking maybe my Q5N2 was faulty. Almost identical receiver characteristics (no surprise, same board)

I think it highlights that different people have completely different ideas of what a "great receiver" is and hear different things from the same receiver. (Example being Pez here, who apparently has experience with some high quality receivers but sings praise for this radio).

And yes, I've heard Scott on more than one of his videos saying he runs the NR on these new radios cranked to 5 - yikes. Much like I wouldn't ever run the NR on most of my HF transceivers that high, wouldn't want to listen to that very long.

Your best bet for listening to one of these new board radios for long periods of time and can't stand harsh hiss of lots of internally generated noise floor is to back the RF gain down and compensate with AF gain but doesn't solve the annoying S meter funkyness.

Again, sub $300 radio. What did we expect. I know full well my expectations (based on hype I read) were unrealistic.
 
Last edited:
I think it highlights that different people have completely different ideas of what a "great receiver" is and hear different things from the same receiver. (Example being Pez here, who apparently has experience with some high quality receivers but sings praise for this radio).
Please watch the videos I posted and tell me what you think?
It should show that my radio works exactly as it should, based on how it performs against 3 other radios of totally different types.



If your radio performed like mine does in the videos, would you be happy with it?



A possibility is that there could be a batch fault, either in alignment or with components. So far, my videos are the only ones posted comparing various radios. And in my videos, everything is working great on my AT-5555Nii (and the 3 others I have had here previously). I would like to see the problems being discussed here being demonstrated in videos, so we can all start to narrow down on any issues, with batches or otherwise. Then we can work on solving any issues people are having.

Anytone really do care about making good quality products. And when it comes to solving potential problems, they need very clear information to work with. Let's see what we can find out. If there are issues, we will need data, and facts that we can show and demonstrate to them. I don't have any problems with my radio, but I am more than happy to help out folks that do.

73.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdchet and FredTx63
Pez,

Somehow missed you'd posted those videos - I see them now on the previous page. I'll check them out this evening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pez
New here and I just got the Q5N2 for Christmas. Took two 5/8 wave for foot Firestick antennas and configured them as a flat side dipole about 20 feet in the air. I guess you would call that a 1.25 wave length dipole. I couldn’t be happier, it’s performing better than I could expect it. Great radio and I have to thank everybody that has contributed to this thread with the information that helped me make my choice. 73’s.

Let me see if I am understanding this ^^^ correctly. Correct me if I got this wrong...

You took "two 5/8 wave for (I assume you meant 'four') foot Firestick antennas and configured them as 1.25 wave dipole"?

Are you using a tuner with that? What do the SWR's look like, untuned?

Just curious... 73's!
 
I would like to see the problems being discussed here being demonstrated in videos, so we can all start to narrow down on any issues...

I would LOVE to do that. And I tried to do that in my very first post on this issue. I was able to take video on my I-phone, and transfer it to my PC successfully, but when I tried to "attach files", I was unable to.

So I went and did the same thing with my Panasonic Lumix camera. I took a very nice quality video, was able to watch it on my PC, but unable to post it here. I guess that the "attach files" here is strictly for pictures, and doesn't allow large files that video requires.

I don't do YouTube, other than watching videos there.

But even if I had a video, what you would see is exactly as I described. Four radios being compared to the new one (the 5555N2), each displaying a totally quiet receive with zero signal or noise floor. Each set to SSB, with no NB, no NR, no pre-amp, and no att.

Then with the 5555 placed in the same spot, with the same antenna plugged in, on the same frequency, 5 S-units of steady hash, and on EVERY frequency that the radio can do, for 28-30 MHz.

And now, the other gentleman confirming that his radio meter is squirrely, and his audio relatively crappy.

The audio, I pretty much expected to be sub-optimal on a radio like this, even using a nice external speaker, as I always do with every transceiver I use. So that's not a big deal for me.

But what IS a big deal, is having a constant 5 S-units of S-meter deflection, seemingly BUILT IN to the radio, when I hook up an antenna to it, when I know for a fact that nothing should be showing up on the meter whatsoever.

The best way to describe it, is to imagine having a radio with a pre-amp hooked up to it and turned on. Funny thing is, I NEVER use those either on a "10 meter" amp. Because all they do is amplify the noise, as well.

Soooo....

Anyone else have a 5555N2 that does this? Ever-present noise floor, shown on your S-meter?
 
Anyone else have a 5555N2 that does this? Ever-present noise floor, shown on your S-meter?
I do. Its floor when an antenna is connected is probably just under S5. It is the same when I have the main breaker off to the house and am running the radio from a good 12 volt car battery I temporarily liberated from my truck for this testing. I have not yet been able to test the radio from a completely different location though.

After a lot of internal kvetching, I just decided that it's just the way this radio is and it is still the best radio I know of for my needs that is within my budget. If I did not use this radio I really don't know which one I would buy for around the same money that has comparable features and no noise "issue". Other brands I've looked at may be less noisy (don't know for sure) but their frequency drift reputation is as sucky as extra noise.

It's been a long, long time since I last purchased a new radio (a 2510 in about 1998 and 500 miles east of here) so this noise is a new phenomenon to me. Definitely not ideal but it's one of many compromises I have to make in life. YMMV. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shadetree Mechanic
I do. Its floor when an antenna is connected is probably just under S5. It is the same when I have the main breaker off to the house and am running the radio from a good 12 volt car battery I temporarily liberated from my truck for this testing. I have not yet been able to test the radio from a completely different location though.

After a lot of internal kvetching, I just decided that it's just the way this radio is and it is still the best radio I know of for my needs that is within my budget. If I did not use this radio I really don't know which one I would buy for around the same money that has comparable features and no noise "issue". Other brands I've looked at may be less noisy (don't know for sure) but their frequency drift reputation is as sucky as extra noise.

It's been a long, long time since I last purchased a new radio (a 2510 in about 1998 and 500 miles east of here) so this noise is a new phenomenon to me. Definitely not ideal but it's one of many compromises I have to make in life. YMMV. :)
Thanks for the info. Can you please share your serial number with us? Cheers
 
I've been researching some other radios to see what folks say about the noise on them compared to the hash that's described on the Q5N2. and what I experience myself. Actually I just don't feel like doing any real work today. Just kicking the can today, so to speak.

1673817331433.png
 
Hi everyone I found this old video titled

Why your modern SSB side band CB receive is noisy. A look at crystal filters on spectrum analyzer.​

I don't know if it's relavant or not.
 
I do. Its floor when an antenna is connected is probably just under S5. It is the same when I have the main breaker off to the house and am running the radio from a good 12 volt car battery I temporarily liberated from my truck for this testing. I have not yet been able to test the radio from a completely different location though.

After a lot of internal kvetching, I just decided that it's just the way this radio is and it is still the best radio I know of for my needs that is within my budget. If I did not use this radio I really don't know which one I would buy for around the same money that has comparable features and no noise "issue". Other brands I've looked at may be less noisy (don't know for sure) but their frequency drift reputation is as sucky as extra noise.

It's been a long, long time since I last purchased a new radio (a 2510 in about 1998 and 500 miles east of here) so this noise is a new phenomenon to me. Definitely not ideal but it's one of many compromises I have to make in life. YMMV. :)

Houston... We have a BINGO ^^^

Thank you, sir.

This is exactly what I was wanting to know. You seem to have the exact same issue that my radio displays. And make no mistake, this is NOT "normal", however it may very well be "typical" for THIS radio, which is exactly what I was trying to find out.

Your description matches my own, and a couple of other people here who've responded to my query. And I think that it actually matches a lot MORE people here who aren't chiming in, because their DSP NR keeps them happy enough.

Speaking of the NR, I think that the reason that so many people seem so enamored with, and elated, that this radio includes NR (while most all other 10/11 meter radios do not), is because if it didn't have it, it would suck with that noise on receive.

It seems that the only way to make this radio "enjoyable" to listen to, is to use the NR, which, in the past (with HF radios) was used in situations where there is some kind of RFI inundating your receive. It was never something that should be necessary at a quiet (RFI and noise floor free) QTH.

But this radio seems to NEED it turned on all the time. Which is why people GUSH about how wonderful it "works"... lol. For example, I could take my HR2510, hook it up, and experience a nice quiet receive, and hear most everything that my 7610 hears on a quiet band with no noise floor.

But if I switch in the 5555N2, I have a NOISY radio that is annoying to listen to, UNLESS I turn on the NR, which takes down the noise (but not the visible noise floor on the meter), and I get to listen to the quieter (but wavery underwater) audio that NR produces.

I will admit that the NR on this radio DOES sound pretty decent, unless you use it too high, which is why most people here seem to like the 2 or 3 setting. But ask yourself, would you love the receive on this radio WITHOUT the NR? Seems like the reason that they included it on this rig, is because without it, people would NOT like it.

This is all just my personal opinion. And you know what they say about opinions... lol.

But KUDOS to Timmy here, because you pretty much summed up my feelings about the radio perfectly. And that is, if the radio is simply inherently like this, and mine isn't a "defective" or mal-aligned unit, then I'm likely to keep it and deal with it, rather than feel as if I got screwed, and consequently return it.

As I have said previously, this radio is great in most ways (for what it is and costs) which is why it sucks for it to have this one glaring short-coming.

So... That being said...

If I DO keep it, then there are a few changes I would like to make on it. Maybe someone here can steer me in the right direction.

1) I'd like to adjust my S-Meter. I went into the Service Mode to take a look around. Didn't see the proper menu item to adjust the S-Meter. Does anyone know which menu number it is? Every HF radio I've ever owned has had an S-meter adjustment that is obviously adjusted at the factory using a signal generator.

If this radio doesn't HAVE an adjusment for the S-meter, that would mean that it's "built-in" to the firmware of this design, and a truly crappy way of doing it, IMHO. I do realize that if I turn my S-Meter down to zero or 1-S unit (when there's no signal or noise floor), that would mean that a 9 S-unit signal would only show up at around "5".

But hey, that would mean that when I tell someone that their signal is "5&9", it really WOULD be... Ha! :) But seriously, I'd rather see NO reading on the S-Meter (when there is no signal or noise floor), than a 4-5 reading on the meter when I know for a fact that there IS none. At least that way, I can see anything REAL that shows up, along with hearing it, obviously.

2) This radio sounds pretty thin on FM. I don't use FM very often, but would still like to make it sound better, if possible. My IC-7610, shows a 12.5 KHz (25 wide) frequency modulated signal. But this little crackerbox only shows half that. So no wonder the FM is sounds lacking.

Is there a way to adjust the FM Deviation in the Service Menu? If I want to use FM, the reason would likely be for local "high quality" audio communications. I'm sure it's an easy adjustment, but since I don't have the Service manual, I don't know which of the many FM adjustments in this Service Menu to go after.

3) One last thing. I've seen it discussed in previous pages on this thread, the subject of widening the RX and TX bandpass settings from the factory setting of "450-2,500" on SSB. (2K wide audio may be OK for DX'ing, but pretty tight for most of the communications I engage in. I'm not looking for even 3K wide audio, let alone more than that. Just something more like 2.8 would be great. That's generally what I use, even on rigs I've owned that can do 4K.

It's a bit confusing, looking over the varying opinions of people on this thread concerning whether it's doable on this radio, or just a "placebo" as someone called it. Has anyone here managed to adjust their rig for a wider RX and TX bandpass successfully, with favorable results? If I am going to keep this radio, I'd really like to widen it just a bit.

To the people who've responded to my questions on this thread... Thanks! I really appreciate a forum with pleasant and helpful members who go out of their way to try and solve each others issues. You guys are really great.

D
 
Last edited:
I've been researching some other radios to see what folks say about the noise on them compared to the hash that's described on the Q5N2. and what I experience myself. Actually I just don't feel like doing any real work today. Just kicking the can today, so to speak.

View attachment 62129
Having owned numerous incarnations of the 2950 over the years, I can relate with what's said in that article excerpt ^^^. However, my 2950's never had a meter that show a constant noise floor on the meter, when there is none. But a "white noise" effect? Yeah...

A friend of mine recently bought a 2950DX6 that has had the receiver optimized, and it truly sounds very nice, without any of that "white noise" hash that older models of 2950 had. His receive is nice and quiet, but also super sensitive. You can easily make out really weak stations, that aren't even close to registering on the meter. In other words, the exact opposite of this 5555N2.

A radio that is listening to no signal, and to no noise floor, should be very quiet, and most certainly should not be showing S-5 on the meter. I think 90%+ people would agree with that.
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.